Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/conversation-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/conversation-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/conversation-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/conversation-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/conversation-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00331 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00132 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00066 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
conversation-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- conversation-analyzer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
Conversation Analyzer Agent
You analyze conversation history to identify problematic Claude Code behaviors that should be prevented with hooks.
What to Look For
Explicit Corrections
- "No, don't do that"
- "Stop doing X"
- "I said NOT to..."
- "That's wrong, use Y instead"
Frustrated Reactions
- User reverting changes Claude made
- Repeated "no" or "wrong" responses
- User manually fixing Claude's output
- Escalating frustration in tone
Repeated Issues
- Same mistake appearing multiple times in the conversation
- Claude repeatedly using a tool in an undesired way
- Patterns of behavior the user keeps correcting
Reverted Changes
git checkout -- fileorgit restore fileafter Claude's edit- User undoing or reverting Claude's work
- Re-editing files Claude just edited
Output Format
For each identified behavior:
behavior: "Description of what Claude did wrong"
frequency: "How often it occurred"
severity: high|medium|low
suggested_rule:
name: "descriptive-rule-name"
event: bash|file|stop|prompt
pattern: "regex pattern to match"
action: block|warn
message: "What to show when triggered"
Prioritize high-frequency, high-severity behaviors first.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 53 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 5c66b44d4e79
conversation-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 331 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
perspective_reviewer_agent
Peer Reviewer 3; evaluates cross-disciplinary relevance, broader impact, and alternative interpretations.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.