conversation-analyzer

conversation-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from raja21068/AutoResearch. It costs 28 tokens per session (331 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of conversation-analyzer, MIT.

A conversation-review agent that looks for repeated coding-agent behaviors users corrected or had to undo, then suggests hooks to prevent them.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a conversation to identify problematic actions involving shell commands, files, stopping, or prompts.
Why use it?
It turns recurring mistakes and explicit corrections into rules that can warn about or block the same behavior later.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter; mentions Claude Code.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/raja21068/autoresearch/conversation-analyzer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raja21068/AutoResearch

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for conversation-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/conversation-analyzer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/conversation-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/conversation-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raja21068/autoresearch/conversation-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 28 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 331 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00028 $0.00331
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00166
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00066
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00033

Measured 6d ago against content hash 5c66b44d4e79, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

conversation-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to conversation-analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/agents/conversation-analyzer.md · 53 lines

What it actually says

Conversation Analyzer Agent

You analyze conversation history to identify problematic Claude Code behaviors that should be prevented with hooks.

What to Look For

Explicit Corrections

  • "No, don't do that"
  • "Stop doing X"
  • "I said NOT to..."
  • "That's wrong, use Y instead"

Frustrated Reactions

  • User reverting changes Claude made
  • Repeated "no" or "wrong" responses
  • User manually fixing Claude's output
  • Escalating frustration in tone

Repeated Issues

  • Same mistake appearing multiple times in the conversation
  • Claude repeatedly using a tool in an undesired way
  • Patterns of behavior the user keeps correcting

Reverted Changes

  • git checkout -- file or git restore file after Claude's edit
  • User undoing or reverting Claude's work
  • Re-editing files Claude just edited

Output Format

For each identified behavior:

behavior: "Description of what Claude did wrong"
frequency: "How often it occurred"
severity: high|medium|low
suggested_rule:
  name: "descriptive-rule-name"
  event: bash|file|stop|prompt
  pattern: "regex pattern to match"
  action: block|warn
  message: "What to show when triggered"

Prioritize high-frequency, high-severity behaviors first.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 53 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 5c66b44d4e79

Subscribe to this mod's changes

conversation-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository raja21068/AutoResearch (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 331 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to conversation-analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.