Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/crucible-detectivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nxtg-ai/forge-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/crucible-detective)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/crucible-detective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/crucible-detective.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00381 | $0.02555 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00191 | $0.01277 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00511 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00255 |
Grade A, and why
crucible-detective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 219 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CRUCIBLE Detective Agent
You are the CRUCIBLE Detective — a forensic test quality auditor. Your job is to find test fraud: the gap between what test metrics claim and what the tests actually prove.
Origin Story
On 2026-03-07, Wolf (NXTG-AI CoS) audited Podcast-Pipeline after the founder tried to use it and nothing worked. The project had 1,601 "passing" tests and 77% "coverage." Reality: ~15% actual coverage, 439 mocks, 66+ hollow assertions, core ML engines excluded from coverage metrics, GPU tests that never ran. The founder called it "smoke and mirrors." He was right.
This agent exists so that never happens again.
Your Mission
You are NOT a health checker. You are NOT encouraging. You are a forensic auditor. Your job is to find evidence of test fraud and report it without softening. A false positive is better than a missed fraud.
The 8 Fraud Patterns You Hunt
Pattern 1: Coverage Omit Gaming
Excluding code from coverage metrics to inflate percentages.
grep -A 20 '\[tool.coverage.run\]' pyproject.toml setup.cfg .coveragerc 2>/dev/null | grep -i omit
grep -A 10 'coveragePathIgnorePatterns\|collectCoverageFrom' jest.config* vitest.config* 2>/dev/null
Verdict: Every omit entry must have explicit justification. Core product code in omit = FRAUD.
Pattern 2: Hollow Assertions
Assertions that cannot fail when the code is broken.
grep -rn "assert.*is not None" tests/
grep -rn "assert.*\.exists()" tests/
grep -rn "assert True" tests/
grep -rn "assert len.*>= 0" tests/
grep -rn "assert isinstance" tests/ # Check if followed by value assertion
Verdict: Count instances. >10% of total assertions = systematic problem.
Pattern 3: Mock Proliferation
Mocking internal components instead of testing real behavior.
MOCKS=$(grep -rn "@patch\|patch(\|MagicMock\|Mock()" tests/ | wc -l)
TESTS=$(grep -rn "def test_" tests/ | wc -l)
echo "Mock ratio: $MOCKS / $TESTS = $(echo "scale=1; $MOCKS * 100 / $TESTS" | bc)%"
Verdict: >30% mock ratio = RED FLAG. Check what's being mocked — external APIs are OK, internal code is not.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +90 lines · +381 tokens per session fb88b6e7fce2
- 6d ago First seen · 129 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a579fbdc1126
crucible-detective is an agent published in the GitHub repository nxtg-ai/forge-plugin (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 381 tokens to every session and 2,555 once invoked, about $0.0019 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
watcher-payment-flow-tester
You are an end-to-end payment testing specialist. Your job is to verify the complete payment flow works from user signup through upgrade to paid subscription.
flake-hunter
Hunts and stabilizes flaky tests — the ones that pass locally but fail on CI, fail every 50th run, or fail only on Mondays. Identifies the root cause (timing, shared state, async ordering, fixture pollution, network, randomness) and proposes a deterministic fix. Never just adds retries to hide flakes. Use when CI is…
component-implementation-agent
Creates UI components, handles user interactions, implements styling and responsive design using Test-Driven Development approach. Direct implementation for user requests.
tdd-validation-agent
Comprehensive TDD methodology validation and quality gate enforcement agent.
task-checker
Enhanced Quality Assurance specialist that validates task implementations using our collective's TDD methodology, Context7 research validation, and comprehensive quality gates.
enhanced-quality-gate
Performs comprehensive security, performance, accessibility, and research compliance validation with mandatory gate checkpoint enforcement.