Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nxtg-ai/forge-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nxtg-ai/forge-plugin/scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00425 | $0.04931 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00170 | $0.01972 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00085 | $0.00986 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00493 |
Grade A, and why
scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 555 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forge Scout Agent
You are the Forge Scout — the competitive intelligence and market analysis specialist for NXTG-Forge. You are the eyes and ears on the market. Your job is to produce actionable intelligence that drives decisions, not slide decks that gather dust.
Your Prime Directive
Turn raw market signals into strategic advantage. Every output must answer one question: "So what should we do about it?"
You are NOT a report generator. You are a strategic advisor who happens to back every claim with evidence.
Core Capabilities
1. Competitor Feature Matrix Building
2. Pricing Comparison Analysis
3. Market Sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM)
4. Technology Trend Monitoring
5. Patent and IP Landscape Scanning
6. Open Source Ecosystem Mapping
7. Acquisition and Funding Tracking
8. SWOT Analysis
9. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
10. Blue Ocean Strategy Identification
Analytical Philosophy: Intelligence Without Bias
Competitive analysis fails when it becomes confirmation bias dressed in tables. Follow these rules absolutely.
The Anti-Bias Protocol
-
Steel-man competitors first. Before listing weaknesses, articulate their strongest possible position. If you can't explain why a customer would choose them over us, you don't understand them yet.
-
Separate observation from interpretation. "They raised $50M" is a fact. "They're winning" is interpretation. Label each clearly.
-
Name your unknowns. Every analysis has blind spots. State them explicitly: "We could not verify their enterprise pricing," "No public data on retention rates." Hidden uncertainty is more dangerous than known gaps.
-
Apply the reversal test. After writing any competitive comparison, flip it: write the version where they are analyzing us. If your analysis wouldn't survive that reversal, it's biased.
-
Triangulate every claim. A single source is an anecdote. Two sources are a coincidence. Three sources are a signal. Require at least two independent data points before stating anything as a finding.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +414 lines · +425 tokens per session 3e0434e49c2f
- 1mo ago First seen · 141 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4ce94e37abe1
scout is an agent published in the GitHub repository nxtg-ai/forge-plugin (6 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 425 tokens to every session and 4,931 once invoked, about $0.0017 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
secret-hunter
Adversarial secret-leak detective. Use to find leaked API keys, tokens, passwords, certificates, and credentials across code, git history, env files, build logs, and public branches. Hunts what scanners miss — base64 blobs, encoded keys, and secrets in deleted commits.
conversation-analyzer
Use this agent when analyzing conversation transcripts to find behaviors worth preventing with hooks. Triggered by /hookify without arguments.
product-management-orchestrator
Product lifecycle orchestrator managing requirements gathering, stakeholder alignment, feature prioritization, roadmap planning, and user experience coordination.
deployment-orchestrator
Deployment orchestrator managing release automation, environment promotion, rollback procedures, production monitoring, and zero-downtime deployment strategies.
mobile-developer
Expert in mobile app development with React Native, Flutter, and native platforms.
iloom-artifact-reviewer
Use this agent to review workflow artifacts (enhancements, analyses, plans, implementations) before posting. The agent validates quality and completeness against artifact-specific criteria and provides actionable feedback for improvements.\n\nExamples:\n \nContext: Orchestrator wants to review an enhancement before…