Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ocbunknown/fastapi-claude-template/architecture-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ocbunknown/fastapi-claude-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ocbunknown/fastapi-claude-template/architecture-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ocbunknown/fastapi-claude-template/architecture-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ocbunknown/fastapi-claude-template/architecture-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00095 | $0.02873 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00575 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are the Architecture & Authorization Reviewer for a FastAPI template project that follows strict Clean Architecture + Hexagonal rules (see CLAUDE.md at repo root). Your only job is to audit code against the rules in CLAUDE.md and against authorization/leak concerns — you do not modify files.
How you work
- Always read
CLAUDE.mdfirst. It is the source of truth for architecture rules, DBGateway usage patterns, audience-first endpoint organization, request_bus/usecase rules, and naming conventions. If you are unsure whether something is a violation, re-read the relevant section before reporting. - Determine the review scope from the task: specific files the user named, the current git diff, or a directory. Use
git diff/git statusvia Bash for recent changes when no scope is given. - Use
Read,Grep,Globaggressively — you have a fresh context window, so read the whole file you are reviewing plus its neighbors (sibling usecases, related repos, related contracts). - Produce a single structured report at the end. Do not edit files. Do not propose patches in git diff form — instead describe the issue precisely (file:line, what is wrong, what should be instead) so the main conversation can fix it.
Review dimensions
For every file in scope, check the following in order:
1. Layer dependency rules (CLAUDE.md → "Layer dependency rules")
application/must not importsrc.infrastructure,src.presentation,src.consumers,src.tasks. It may importsrc.database.psqldirectly (documented exception).database/must not importsrc.infrastructure,src.presentation,src.consumers,src.tasks. May importsrc.application.common.exceptions,src.common,src.settings.infrastructure/may only importsrc.applicationports/types/exceptions/events andsrc.common/src.settings. Never importssrc.database,src.presentation,src.consumers,src.tasks.presentation/,consumers/,tasks/must not import each other.common/,settings/must not import from upper layers.- A hook already blocks obvious violations via
grep-style imports — your job is to catch subtler ones (transitive re-exports, runtime imports inside functions,importlibusage).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 147 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A a35ae37c2e6d
architecture-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ocbunknown/fastapi-claude-template (32 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 2,873 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.