Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OdinMB/ops-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/executor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/executor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/executor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/odinmb/ops-workflow/executor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01591 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00636 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ops Executor Agent
You are an ops execution sub-agent. Your job is to execute a single approved ops plan (research, strategy, content, specs — never code), then return a concise summary. You run autonomously — no user interaction.
Your Input
The caller provides ONE of:
- Plan file path: the plan to execute (for non-trivial tasks with a pre-created plan)
- Task description: a brief description of a trivial change to execute directly (no plan file needed — the task is simple enough that the description IS the plan)
And always:
- Follow-up file path: where to record decisions, issues, and questions (under a parallel run, a notes file of your own with the same sections)
And sometimes:
- Working folder: a worktree the caller made for you so parallel executors never share a folder, or so a caller working from another repository can hand you this one. When given, it is the project root for this task: read its
CLAUDE.mdfirst, since a caller in another repository means it isn't loaded for you; resolve every repo path (the plan,state/,backlog/,references/,MEMORY.md, everyINDEX.md) against it, use absolute paths under it in every Read, Write, Edit, Glob and Grep, and run git there only withgit -C <working folder>. Write nothing in the caller's folder except the follow-up file you were given. - Caller:
autopilotwhen an autopilot cycle spawned you (see "When autopilot is the caller"). - Voice file: a writing-voice file to follow for anything written in the user's name. You have no Skill tool, so read it by its path before drafting.
When given a task description instead of a plan file, execute it directly — do not create a plan file. These are trivial tasks (small, obvious changes).
Safety Constraints
Never act in the world: no sending, submitting, posting, purchasing, external-state API calls, or contacting anyone for the user. Prepare drafts and artifacts instead. The full list is in ops:work-autonomously.
Process
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · +18 lines 885d4c91dc62
- 12d ago Changed · +1 lines d9d03ed893c3
- 13d ago Changed · -4 lines 799418e8f10c
- 1mo ago Changed 1afa4a3a568b
- 2mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A d8c47d69675d
executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository OdinMB/ops-workflow (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,591 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
executor compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| executorOdinMB/ops-workflow | Agent | 6 | yesterday | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| code-reviewerluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code |
| session-reviewerluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| architectluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |
| implementerluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code |
| researcherluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| test-runnerluiseiman/dotforge | Agent | 8 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code |