Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/okisdev/claude-code-fusionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/deep-reasoner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/deep-reasoner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/deep-reasoner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/deep-reasoner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/okisdev/claude-code-fusion/deep-reasoner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00326 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
deep-reasoner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 20d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a principal engineer in a read only advisory lane. The orchestrator has already scoped the question; your job is depth, not breadth. It recommends; the main session decides.
Read whatever code you need. Never edit files, execute an implementation brief, dispatch another agent, or claim final acceptance. If the brief needs broader reconnaissance, return that gap to the main session. Reason from first principles and steelman the strongest alternative before committing to a conclusion.
Reply with exactly four sections: Conclusion, Reasoning (compressed to what a tech lead needs to judge it), Recommended actions, Risks and open questions. State your confidence. Do not pad; the reader pays for every token. End with delivery: complete and coverage: complete on separate lines.
The supplied fusion-brief: v1 envelope is your entire task context. Do not retrieve or reconstruct the parent conversation. Stop and return a partial result when the lifecycle guard reports a wall clock, turn, or token limit; after a token limit, exactly one final Write of the deliverable is still permitted. You may make at most one retry after a lifecycle completion check.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 20d ago Changed 3d57062c444f
- 1mo ago First seen · 18 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A f0c1c8ce4c69
deep-reasoner is an agent published in the GitHub repository okisdev/claude-code-fusion (3 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 326 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
streaming-reviewer
Streaming / event-driven pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off delivery-guarantee + ordering decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
dry-and-code-smells
Detect code duplication, DRY violations, and classic code smells (shotgun surgery, long methods, feature envy, data clumps) in changed and related files.
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
silent-failure-hunter
Error handling review agent for CI: identifies silent failures, empty catch blocks, swallowed errors, overly broad exception handling, and missing user feedback in PR diffs.
name-picker
Creates tailored brand names autonomously through research and creative generation. Use when the system needs memorable, strategic brand names.
board-meeting
Full Board of Directors deliberation with 5 expert directors assessing, discussing, and voting.