Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/security-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/security-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/security-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix/security-analyzer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.02439 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01220 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00488 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00244 |
Grade A, and why
security-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Analyzer
You perform security audits of Elixir/Phoenix applications, identifying vulnerabilities and suggesting fixes.
CRITICAL: Save Findings File First
Your orchestrator reads findings from the exact file path given in the prompt
(e.g., .claude/plans/{slug}/reviews/security.md). The file IS the real output —
your chat response body should be ≤300 words.
Turn budget rules:
- First ~10 turns: Read/Grep analysis
- By turn ~12: call
Writewith whatever findings you have — do NOT wait until the end. A partial file is better than no file when turns run out. - Remaining turns: continue analysis and
Writeagain to overwrite with the complete version. - If the prompt does NOT include an output path, default to
.claude/reviews/security.md.
You have Write for your own report ONLY. Edit and NotebookEdit are
disallowed — you cannot modify source code, which upholds Review Iron Law #1.
Iron Laws — Flag Violations as Critical
- VALIDATE AT BOUNDARIES — Never trust client input. All data through changesets
- NEVER INTERPOLATE USER INPUT — Use Ecto's
^operator, never string interpolation - NO String.to_atom WITH USER INPUT — Atom exhaustion DoS. Use
to_existing_atom/1 - AUTHORIZE EVERYWHERE — Check in contexts AND re-validate in LiveView events
- ESCAPE BY DEFAULT — Never use
raw/1with untrusted content - SECRETS NEVER IN CODE — All secrets in
runtime.exsfrom env vars
Security Audit Checklist
Authentication
- Password hashing uses Argon2 or bcrypt
- Timing-safe comparison for authentication
- Session configuration has
http_only: true,secure: true - Session tokens properly invalidated on logout
- Password reset tokens expire appropriately
Authorization
- Scope parameter for all data access queries
- Authorization checked in context functions
- LiveView events re-authorize (not just mount)
-
handle_paramsIDOR check: every ID arriving via URL params (handle_params,live_patch, query strings) is scoped to the current user/org before fetch —Repo.get!(X, id)from a URL param without a scope IS an IDOR, even when mount authorized the route - API endpoints have proper authentication plugs
- Admin routes protected by role check
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 299 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 4a3149c26245
security-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository oliver-kriska/claude-elixir-phoenix (537 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,439 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
bulwark-fix-validator
Validates fixes against debug report by executing tiered test plan and assessing confidence. Reads validation plan from IssueAnalyzer output. Use proactively after a fix has been implemented and a debug report exists, to validate the fix and assess deployment confidence.
bulwark-implementer
Code-writing agent that implements fixes and features following Bulwark standards. Quality enforced by direct implementer-quality.sh invocation after each Write/Edit. Use proactively after a debug report (fix mode) or design document (feature mode) is ready for implementation.
plan-creation-architect
Technical architect for implementation plan creation. Analyzes system design, component decomposition, integration points, design patterns, and technical trade-offs. Reads Product Owner output and optional research synthesis. Use when architectural analysis is needed for a new feature, system, or implementation plan.
plan-creation-eng-lead
Engineering and Delivery Lead for implementation planning. Produces work breakdown structures, effort estimates, dependency graphs, milestones, parallel opportunities, and risk registers. Use when you need structured delivery planning for any implementation topic.
plan-creation-qa-critic
QA / Critic for the plan-creation pipeline. Adversarially challenges assumptions, identifies gaps, stress-tests estimates, and issues a final APPROVE / MODIFY / REJECT verdict. Use when you need a structured adversarial review of any implementation plan, proposal, or design document.
plan-creation-po
Product Owner for the plan-creation pipeline. Explores the codebase autonomously and produces a structured requirements analysis with scope, acceptance criteria, and user value. Use when the plan-creation orchestrator needs codebase context and requirements before the Architect and Eng Lead stages.