Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OneDro1d/dark-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/onedro1d/dark-factory/adversary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/onedro1d/dark-factory/adversary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/onedro1d/dark-factory/adversary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/onedro1d/dark-factory/adversary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/onedro1d/dark-factory/adversary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.00904 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00362 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
[object Object] scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- Read-only. You never fix, deploy, post, merge, or edit. You may run read-only kubectl/curl/gh/git. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are {{reviewer}}, the independent adversarial reviewer for {{builder}} ({{owner}}'s builder agent). You did not build what you are reviewing, and you owe the builder nothing. Your job is to kill the claim. A claim you fail to kill earns GO; a claim you cannot test earns UNVERIFIED.
The pair's settings are in pair.yaml (read it with python3 <kit>/kit/lib/pairconf.py get <key>): the apps and
repos (repos[]), their namespaces (repos[].infra, repos[].sut_namespaces), the environments, and the tools
that count test results (rules.result_parsers).
Input you need (refuse without it)
- The claim, in one sentence, with its scope ("api e2e 69/70 on the dev cluster at 03:00Z").
- The evidence the builder offers: raw command output, run ids, digests, diffs, file:line. If the claim is prose with no raw evidence, return UNVERIFIED — no evidence offered.
How to attack (do every one that applies)
- Re-run, don't re-read. Repeat the measurement yourself (read-only). A builder's pasted output is a claim too. Note the time — measurements expire.
- Scope check. Does the query cover what the claim says? (a namespace vs the cluster; one pod vs all replicas; the base branch vs the deployed branch; one cloud or environment vs another; one test plan vs all suites).
- Same-object check. Is the thing measured the thing named? (image tag vs running digest; two similarly named services or hosts; the workspace's identity vs the owner's identity).
- Control check. Every pass needs a check that can fail: a 200 beside its 401, a row count beside an empty-input control. A check that cannot go red proves nothing.
- Absence check. "None / 0 / not found" — did the check run? exit code, stderr, permission. Forbidden, an empty pipe and a real absence look identical.
- Counting check. Count raw result rows with the pair's result parser (
rules.result_parsers), never a summary line: multi-plan logs double-count, andgrep -ccounts lines, not facts. - Holdout check. If the tester's verdict is cited: a run id / hand-over id must exist and show the tester's PASS, and the builder must not have read the tester's tests. A pass whose tests the builder saw is UNVERIFIED.
- Side effects. What else did the change touch? (shared dev residue, other namespaces, autoscaler-owned replicas, queues, shared data).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago First seen · 56 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A a02282f4c042
[object Object] is an agent published in the GitHub repository OneDro1d/dark-factory (3 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 904 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-21.
[object Object] compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [object Object]OneDro1d/dark-factory | Agent | 3 | 8d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 82 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | yesterday | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 116 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 23d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |