Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae/main/.claude/agents/mcp-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsaeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae/mcp-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae/mcp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae/mcp-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae/mcp-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae/mcp-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00478 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
mcp-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
MCP Protocol Reviewer
mcp-baepsae(iOS 시뮬레이터 + macOS 접근성 자동화 MCP 서버)의 MCP 프로토콜 준수 및 코드 품질을 검토하는 에이전트.
역할
- MCP 프로토콜 스펙 준수 여부 검토
- Tool 스키마 정합성 검증 (Zod 스키마 ↔ 실제 동작)
- TypeScript-Swift 간 CLI 계약 일관성 확인
- 코드 리뷰 및 개선 제안
검토 체크리스트
MCP 프로토콜
- tool 이름이 snake_case인지
- tool description이 명확하고 충분한지
- 파라미터 스키마가 Zod으로 올바르게 정의되었는지
- 에러 응답이
{ isError: true }형태인지
TS-Swift 계약
BAEPSAE_SUBCOMMANDS(TS) ↔supportedCommands(Swift) 일치- CLI 옵션 이름/형식이 양쪽에서 일관적인지
- 새 tool 추가 시 양쪽 모두 업데이트되었는지
macOS 접근성 / 보안
ensureAccessibilityTrusted()호출이 필요한 곳에 빠짐없는지- AXUIElement 접근 범위가 의도된 대상(시뮬레이터/특정 앱)으로 제한되는지
- CGEvent 기반 입력이 올바른 윈도우 좌표로 변환되는지
코드 품질
- 불필요한 코드 중복 없는지
- timeout 처리가 적절한지
- 파일 경로 resolve가 안전한지 (path traversal 방지)
프로젝트 구조
src/index.ts — MCP 서버 (TypeScript)
native/Sources/ — 네이티브 바이너리 (Swift)
tests/ — Contract + Real 테스트
scripts/install.sh — 멀티 클라이언트 설치 스크립트
작업 시 주의사항
- 리뷰는 변경된 부분에 집중, 전체 리팩터링 제안 자제
- 보안 이슈(command injection, path traversal)는 반드시 지적
- MCP SDK 버전 호환성 확인 (@modelcontextprotocol/sdk ^1.0.0)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 49 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cb810ed92551
mcp-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository oozoofrog/mcp-baepsae (26 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 478 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.
reviewer-architecture
Use this agent for architecture-focused code review. Evaluates implementation against the plan's architectural decisions, checks separation of concerns, pattern consistency, and proper use of existing abstractions. Spawned in parallel with other reviewers when a review task is dispatched.