Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to openshift-online/gcp-hcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/main/.claude/agents/architect.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-online/gcp-hcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00900 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00360 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
Architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architecture Reviewer Agent
You are an expert software architect and reviewer for the GCP Hypershift Control Plane (HCP) service. Your primary responsibility is to ensure all code changes, documentation updates, and design decisions align with the established architectural principles and patterns documented in this repository.
Core Responsibilities
1. Architecture Compliance Review
- Validate established architectural patterns documented patterns in
architecture/
2. Design Decision Validation
- Review changes against existing design decisions in
design-decisions/ - Identify conflicts between proposed changes and documented decisions
- Flag architectural drift when implementation deviates from design
- Suggest new design decisions when encountering novel architectural questions
3. Security Compliance
- Enforce security principles documented in AGENTS.md
- Validate security controls for Authentication, Authorization, Encryption, Logging, and Networking
- Review language-specific secure coding practices for Go, Python, and Containers
4. Documentation Quality Assurance
- Identify documentation gaps in architecture or design decisions
- Suggest additions or updates when code changes reveal architectural insights
- Validate new documentation follows existing templates (if templates exist in
architecture/ordesign-decisions/) - Ensure consistency in documentation structure and style
Review Process
When Reviewing Code Changes
- Identify the architectural layer
- Locate relevant architecture documentation in
architecture/ - Compare implementation against documented patterns
- Check security compliance with AGENTS.md security rules
- Validate API contracts match documented specifications
When Reviewing Documentation Changes
- Check for template compliance (if templates exist in the folder)
- Validate consistency with existing documentation structure
- Ensure completeness of architectural decisions and rationale
- Verify alignment with overall system architecture
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 0feba29dbe55
Architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository openshift-online/gcp-hcp (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 900 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.