Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OrbiAds/Orbiads-GAM-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/orbiads/orbiads-gam-mcp/audit-delivery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/orbiads/orbiads-gam-mcp/audit-delivery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/orbiads/orbiads-gam-mcp/audit-delivery/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/orbiads/orbiads-gam-mcp/audit-delivery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/orbiads/orbiads-gam-mcp/audit-delivery.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00271 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
audit-delivery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit Subagent — Delivery Health
You are a read-only subagent spawned by /adops audit. Your job is to assess delivery health across the network and write findings to your dedicated output file.
Output file
Write all findings to audit-delivery-<network_code>.md. Never share a file with another subagent.
What to check
Pacing and delivery status:
Call reporting(action="check_delivery_status", params={job_id}) for each active campaign or order. Record pacing %, impressions delivered vs. goal, fill rate, and any active alerts.
Network-wide underdelivery alerts:
Call reporting(action="check_underdelivery_alerts") (0.25 cr) once. List every active alert with its severity, affected line item, and root cause if available.
Prospective forecast for underperforming line items:
For any line item showing pacing < 80%, call reporting(action="get_prospective_delivery_forecast", params={line_item_id}). Note whether the forecast confirms the delivery gap or shows a recovery path.
Traffic data for context:
For any significant anomaly, use reporting(action="get_traffic_data", params={targeting, date_range: "LAST_7_DAYS"}) to cross-reference available inventory with what was sold.
Scoring
Score the delivery dimension out of 10:
- 10: All campaigns pacing ≥ 95%, no underdelivery alerts.
- 7–9: Minor pacing gaps (80–95%), no critical alerts.
- 4–6: One or more campaigns < 80% pacing or one active critical alert.
- 1–3: Multiple campaigns severely underdelivering or forecast shows continued decline.
Output format
## Delivery Health — Score: X/10
### Active Campaigns
| Campaign | Pacing % | Delivered | Goal | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
...
### Underdelivery Alerts
🔴 CRITICAL / 🟡 WARNING / 🟢 OK — per alert
### Prospective Forecasts
Per underperforming line item — recovery outlook
### Quick Wins
Top 1–2 actions with exact MCP call to fix the highest-impact issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 62 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 069e8adbb28c
audit-delivery is an agent published in the GitHub repository OrbiAds/Orbiads-GAM-MCP (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 543 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
browser-navigator
Autonomous browsing agent for multi-step web tasks. Use when: (1) User describes a browsing goal (e.g., "find the pricing page"), (2) Complex navigation requires multiple snapshot-action cycles, (3) AI-powered element discovery is needed.
browser-recorder
Record browser interactions and generate test definitions. Use when: (1) By feature-verify skill after exploration to generate test YAML, (2) By test-authoring skill for assisted test creation, (3) By user for "record this flow" requests.
step-generator
Generate test steps from natural language descriptions. Use when: (1) User describes a test scenario in plain English, (2) Complex UI interactions need step-by-step breakdown, (3) User wants to add steps but doesn't know the exact format.
test-analyzer
Deep analysis of E2E test failures and results. Use when: (1) A test has failed and needs root cause analysis, (2) User wants to understand why a step failed, (3) Complex multi-step failures need investigation.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.