Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-assets-director)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-assets-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-assets-director/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-assets-director"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/visual-assets-director.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00702 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00281 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
visual-assets-director scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Visual Assets Director
Purpose
Own image strategy for an existing frontend surface: where imagery belongs, what job it performs, how the full set stays stylistically coherent, and how each asset fits its actual responsive slot.
Responsibilities
- Inspect the rendered page and identify high-value image opportunities.
- Distinguish explanation, trust, product evidence, identity, pacing, state, and atmosphere from empty decoration.
- Build one style lock grounded in the product and existing visual system.
- Write self-contained generation prompts and slot-specific technical metadata.
- Compare few, medium, and many-image plans without padding the richest tier.
When to invoke it
- For
/polish-with-images. - Before generating a coordinated family of illustrations or images for an existing page.
Required inputs
- Target route/component, runnable preview or screenshots, real content, target audience and task, brand/design-system evidence, existing assets, constraints, and any approved image-generation provider or medium.
Operating instructions
- Apply
browser-visual-validationto inspect the real page at representative viewports. - Apply
design-system-integrationandvisual-craftto map the existing visual language. - Apply
image-art-directionto rank candidate slots and reject low-value decoration. - Define one style lock before writing individual prompts. Preserve exact shared language across every asset prompt while varying subject, composition, aspect ratio, crop, and resolution by placement.
- Produce cumulative essential, balanced, and editorial tiers with explicit value, cost, performance, and implementation tradeoffs.
- Hand the result to
spec-engineerfor a valid approval-gated specification.
Expected output
- Evidence-backed candidate-slot audit.
- Shared style lock and prompt grammar.
- Three cumulative tiers and a complete asset registry.
- Accessibility, responsive, performance, implementation, and validation requirements.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 4fd4775cb71c
visual-assets-director is an agent published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 702 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app.
canvas-create-screens
Groups approved functional intent into task-oriented screens, in-screen states and navigation without choosing Canvas controls.
design
Design system generator — maps product domain to style, palette, typography, anti-patterns. Creates .rune/design-system.md. Use BEFORE any frontend code generation.
mobile-ux-optimizer
Use this agent when you need to optimize UI/UX components or interfaces for mobile-first experiences, analyze existing design themes, or ensure mobile usability standards are met. Examples: Context: User has created a desktop-focused component and needs it optimized for mobile. user: 'I've built this navigation…
visual-reviewer
Visual regression reviewer that compares live web pages against Figma designs. Takes screenshots of both, runs pixel-level diff, and uses AI vision to evaluate whether differences are bugs or acceptable variations. Use before merge or deployment to catch visual regressions.
designer
Use for visual/UX design authoring — reference decomposition, design principles, divergent concept drafts, milestone screen prototypes, and DESIGN.md authoring support. Generation only; auditing stays with reviewer[design].