Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to pandazki/pneuma-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pandazki/pneuma-skills/main/.claude/agents/pneuma-amender.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pandazki/pneuma-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-amender)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-amender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-amender/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-amender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-amender.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00136 | $0.00290 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00054 | $0.00116 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
pneuma-amender scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to pneuma-amender-fable — 23 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Read .agents/skills/dev-workflow/references/roles/amender.md before acting.
That file is the canonical role instruction shared with Codex.
Read root AGENTS.md and its matching domain-rule pointers as directed there.
Apply the parent's task, checkout, acceptance criteria, and authorization. Use the tools actually available in this session. Return the evidence and result format required by the shared role; do not merely summarize the guide.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines · -22 tokens per session 736738b63272
- 1mo ago Changed · -253 lines scan C → A 8a4a39932341
- 1mo ago First seen · 279 lines · 158 tokens per session scan C 3fe37b1fd0e3
pneuma-amender is an agent published in the GitHub repository pandazki/pneuma-skills (161 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 136 tokens to every session and 290 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to pneuma-amender-fable, differing in 23 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer
Owns an MCP Task Orchestrator work item's review phase — independently verifies the implementation against its plan and fills the review-phase notes its resolved schema requires.
code-reviewer
Reviews code changes for quality, security, and regressions. Use before commits.
php-reviewer
PHP 8.5 and Clean Architecture code review specialist — DDD, hexagonal, PER-CS 3.0, PHPStan, security analysis.
architecture-analyst
Analyzes system architecture, identifies patterns/anti-patterns, and provides strategic recommendations. Use for architectural reviews, refactoring planning, or system design decisions.
verifier
Verification agent for /craft:research-verify. Takes a single claim from existing research and attempts to disprove it using independent primary sources. Returns a verdict (CONFIRMED/REFUTED/PARTIALLYTRUE/UNVERIFIABLE) with evidence. NOT a researcher. Does not discover new topics or cast a wide net. Takes one claim…
code-review
Multi-persona orchestrator for adversarial review of R, Python, Julia, or Stata research scripts. Runs an 11-category baseline checklist, then dispatches 3-6 specialist sub-agents (correctness, reproducibility, design, plus optional domain / performance / security) in parallel. Deduplicates findings across reviewers…