Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to pandazki/pneuma-skills. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pandazki/pneuma-skills/main/.claude/agents/pneuma-impl-fable.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pandazki/pneuma-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-impl-fable)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-impl-fable"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-impl-fable/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-impl-fable"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pandazki/pneuma-skills/pneuma-impl-fable.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00163 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.00160 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
pneuma-impl-fable scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- pneuma-impl — 95% identical, 22 lines differ
What it actually says
Read .agents/skills/dev-workflow/references/roles/impl.md before acting.
That file is the canonical role instruction shared with Codex.
Read root AGENTS.md and its matching domain-rule pointers as directed there.
Apply the parent's task, checkout, acceptance criteria, and authorization. Use the tools actually available in this session. Return the evidence and result format required by the shared role; do not merely summarize the guide.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · -226 lines scan C → A 48b8374ad864
- 11d ago First seen · 251 lines · 163 tokens per session scan C 7d7e01ca4b76
pneuma-impl-fable is an agent published in the GitHub repository pandazki/pneuma-skills (160 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 163 tokens to every session and 320 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
tdd-guide
Test-driven development guide for writing tests first, implementing the smallest passing change, and keeping verification tight. Use when the user explicitly wants TDD or when a task should be driven by failing tests before code.
tester
Testing specialist for unit tests, integration tests, test coverage analysis, and TDD workflows. Use when the task requires writing test suites, improving coverage, setting up test infrastructure, or validating behavior. For example: writing unit tests for a service class, setting up integration test fixtures, or…
test-writer
Use for generating comprehensive tests following TDD/BDD principles.
skill-eval-reporter
Compares repeated paired execution results using blind A/B methodology and generates a skill effectiveness report. Use when valid skill-evaluation result pairs are available.
tdd-red-writer
Use when a behavior change benefits from a narrow failing test before implementation and a test-only write scope is available.
tdd-guide
Enforces strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR test-driven development. Use PROACTIVELY when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code.