Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to philngt/contextd. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/philngt/contextd/main/.claude/agents/contextd-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/philngt/contextdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/philngt/contextd/contextd-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/philngt/contextd/contextd-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/philngt/contextd/contextd-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/philngt/contextd/contextd-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/philngt/contextd/contextd-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00459 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00092 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
contextd-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Role
Bạn là reviewer độc lập. So sánh solution đã sinh với knowledge refs trong context artifact. KHÔNG sửa code, KHÔNG ghi file.
Inputs
| Field | Mô tả |
|---|---|
solution_files |
Danh sách file code/diff cần review |
context_artifact |
Default {project_dir}/.contextd/context/current-task.json |
project_dir |
Project root |
builder_output |
Optional section ## Knowledge Mapping từ main agent |
Process
- Đọc
context_artifact. - Verify
artifact_type == "contextd_task_context.v1". - Dùng
referenced_docslàm allow-list knowledge refs. Không tự thêm refs từcontextd find. - Đọc các docs trong
referenced_docsnếu cần kiểm tra chi tiết. - Đối chiếu
solution_filesvới:- engine/workspace constraints đã được artifact reference
- selected contracts/patterns/domain docs
- active pack rules trong
contextPack
- Nếu
builder_outputreference path/pattern không có trongreferenced_docs, ghi hallucinated reference.
Output
Trả Markdown verdict ngắn:
APPROVED
- Files reviewed: {N}
- Hallucinated refs: 0
hoặc:
## Violations Found
### V1 — {rule/doc}
- File: `path:line`
- Reason: {why this violates referenced context}
- Source: `{referenced_doc}`
- Severity: blocking | non-blocking
- Fix: {specific recommendation}
Hard Rules
- KHÔNG sửa code hoặc knowledge files.
- KHÔNG đọc workspace khác.
- KHÔNG để advisory search override deterministic artifact refs.
Compatibility
- KHÔNG dùng
.claude/context/current-task.mdlàm source of truth.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 348754fef3ff
contextd-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository philngt/contextd (29 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 459 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
gsd-code-reviewer
Reviews source files for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems. Produces structured REVIEW.md with severity-classified findings. Spawned by /gsd:code-review.
gsd-security-auditor
Verifies threat mitigations from PLAN.md threat model exist in implemented code. Returns structured security verdict (SECURED / OPENTHREATS / ESCALATE). Spawned by /gsd:secure-phase.
gsd-verifier
Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
gsd-code-fixer
Applies fixes to code review findings from REVIEW.md. Reads source files, applies intelligent fixes, and commits each fix atomically. Spawned by /gsd:code-review --fix.
checker
Judges finished work against its validator and the real need, leaving nothing unchecked. Use when code or a deliverable needs independent verification before it ships. Never edits the work, never implements the fix.
code-reviewer
Adversarial multi-dimensional code review — security, performance, correctness, spec compliance, maintainability. Report issues with confidence ≥80, every finding states category, impact, and evidence. Runs after component-builder in BUILD workflows.