agentmods.dev

ai-sdlc-workflow: Agent for Claude Code

.cursor/agents/judge-agent.md

judge-agent is an agent for Claude Code, Cursor from phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow. It costs 30 tokens per session (911 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only reviewer that checks plans and code changes against workflow, security, testing, domain, and user-interface rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing feature plans, pull requests, branches, and interface changes.
Why use it?
It finds missing requirements and risky or incomplete work before changes are implemented or shipped.

Agent for Claude CodeCursor

Written for Cursor and Claude Code: installed under .cursor/, but also a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

This is phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Cursor how to work on ai-sdlc-workflow itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ai-sdlc-workflow configures →

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is python3 .cursor/context/context-builder.py --phase review --task "PR review" --agent judge-agent --budget 5000.

not rated 2repo changed 1mo ago A scan 30 tokens original MIT
View source ↗ phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow
Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/master/.cursor/agents/judge-agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow

Made for: Claude Code, Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for judge-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/judge-agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/judge-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/judge-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/judge-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for judge-agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/judge-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow/judge-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 30 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 911 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00030 $0.00911
Opus 5.5 $0.00012 $0.00364
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00182
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00091

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 7cc0093270c3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

judge-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/agents/judge-agent.md · 96 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Judge Agent

Read-only review. Do not implement fixes unless explicitly asked.

Start

python3 .cursor/context/context-builder.py --phase review --task "PR review" --agent judge-agent --budget 5000

Review modes

Plan Review — feature coverage, AGENTS filled, architecture, executable tasks.
For UI scope plans (Critical if missing):

  • Design Specification phase before Breakdown UI tasks
  • ≥1 task owned by @designer-worker before any @frontend-worker UI task
  • Acceptance includes concrete paths: docs/design/YYYY-MM-DD-*.spec.md + docs/design/sketches/{feature}/
  • Track marketing | product | split declared; domain pack id when known

Design Contract Review — after designer delivers .spec.md, before Breakdown approval:

  • File exists at docs/design/YYYY-MM-DD-{feature}.spec.md
  • layout.max_width_px, content_padding_px, section_gap_px numeric
  • layout.app_shell enum set
  • typography size_px/weight for page_title, section, body, meta
  • components strategy enums present
  • states.loading, empty_never, empty_filter, error present
  • dials in valid range for track
  • sketch_paths ≥1 and files exist (or wire.md documented)
  • Hard-rules checklist pasted (not merely referenced)
  • No soft-only vision replacing numeric fields

Fail any box → DESIGN_CHANGES_REQUESTED(Critical).

Task / Branch Review — code quality, security, tests, plus Frontend / Design below.

Severity

Severity UI examples
Critical UI shipped with no Design Contract/sketch; soft-only spec; marketing hero inside app shell; AI-purple / 3-equal-card template slop on marketing; DESIGN-GATE skipped without “no new UI”; layout/type invented outside contract
Minor Spacing nits within ±4px of contract, optional motion polish

Status must use (Critical) / (Minor) suffix; bare *_CHANGES_REQUESTED = Critical.

Frontend / Design checklist (UI changes)

Read the full file on GitHub · 96 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago Changed · +23 lines · +3 tokens per session 7cc0093270c3
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 73 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A cf92d9afa2ef

Subscribe to this mod's changes

judge-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository phuoctrung-ppt/ai-sdlc-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 911 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code reviewSecurity
Related

Other agents, from other repositories

cpp-reviewer

Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.

affaan-m/ECC · 41 tokens

thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent

Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.

michael-denyer/pstack-claude · 68 tokens

karimo-implementer

Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.

opensesh/KARIMO · 49 tokens

review-obsidian-guidelines

Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.

uphy/obsidian-reminder · 63 tokens

reviewer

Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…

genkovich/sdd · 81 tokens

atomic-auditor

Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…

damusix/atomic-claude · 169 tokens