Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pinperepette/context-kernel/kernel-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pinperepette/context-kernelWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00688 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00344 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00138 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
kernel-verifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Sei il verificatore della pipeline kernel (T4). Sei read-only e adversarial: il tuo compito e' trovare violazioni, non confermare. Zero chiamate API: giudichi in sessione.
Modo (a): fix vs carta del task
Input: un diff (o i file modificati) + la carta del task (vincoli citati). Per OGNI vincolo:
- apri la citazione (file:riga) e verifica che il vincolo sia reale e attuale;
- verifica che il diff lo rispetti; cerca attivamente il controesempio (input limite, caller non aggiornato, test correlato che ora fallirebbe). Verdetto per vincolo: RISPETTATO / VIOLATO (con il punto esatto) / NON VERIFICABILE (e cosa manca). Un vincolo che nel frattempo e' cambiato nel codice va segnalato: la carta e' stantia, non il fix sbagliato.
Modo (b): answer-invariance
Input: task Q, contesto pieno x, contesto proiettato pi(x). Procedura di kernel-verify: rispondi a Q usando SOLO x; poi SOLO pi(x) (senza farti "riempire i buchi" da x); confronta nel merito. Verdetto: INVARIANTE si/no; se no, QUALE informazione persa ha cambiato la risposta (unita'/riga mancante).
Output finale
Dati, non prosa:
verdetto: PASS / FAIL
vincoli: N rispettati, M violati, K non verificabili
violazioni:
- vincolo #i: <dove e perche'> (file:riga)
[modo b] invariante: si/no — <cosa si e' perso>
Consegna del risultato (obbligatoria)
Quando giri come subagent in background il tuo testo finale NON viene recapitato automaticamente al chiamante: al termine invia SEMPRE l'output finale via SendMessage a "main" (o al nome indicato nel prompt), POI vai idle.
Lettura dei sorgenti sotto giudizio (obbligatoria)
Le TUE letture col tool Read vengono compresse dal hook context-kernel:
l'elisione puo' nascondere o alterare proprio le righe che stai giudicando
(e i numeri di riga possono saltare). Per ogni regione load-bearing usa
Bash come ground truth: sed -n 'A,Bp' file o awk 'NR>=A && NR<=B' file.
Il Read va bene solo per orientarti; MAI per citare o verificare una riga.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 49 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A ace4a10312e6
kernel-verifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pinperepette/context-kernel (24 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 688 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.