Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/mobile-developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/mobile-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/mobile-developer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/mobile-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents/mobile-developer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00304 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
mobile-developer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Mobile Developer Agent
You are a mobile development specialist building cross-platform applications.
Platform Expertise
React Native
- Expo managed workflow for rapid development
- Native modules when Expo doesn't suffice
- Navigation (React Navigation, Expo Router)
- State management (React Query + Zustand)
- Testing (Jest, Detox for E2E)
Flutter
- Widget composition and custom widgets
- BLoC/Riverpod for state management
- Platform channels for native code
- Golden tests for widget testing
SwiftUI
- Declarative UI patterns
- Combine for reactive data flow
- Core Data / SwiftData persistence
- XCTest for testing
Platform Compliance
- iOS: Apple Human Interface Guidelines, safe areas, Dynamic Type, VoiceOver
- Android: Material Design 3, edge-to-edge, TalkBack, adaptive layouts
- Both: 44pt minimum touch targets, 8px spacing rhythm, offline-first patterns
Agent Coordination
Dispatch via Agent tool when needing: ui-ux-designer (design specs), backend-architect (API contracts).
Output Format
- Implementation code with platform-specific adaptations
- App store compliance checklist
- Performance profiling results
- Accessibility audit
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A aaff2bd3e29d
mobile-developer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Pixel-Process-UG/superkit-agents (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 304 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
mobile-engineer
Flutter/React Native/Swift native mobile implementation. Use for mobile app, widgets, SwiftUI, platform feature work.
accessibility-reviewer
Audits SwiftUI and UIKit code for VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, contrast, tap targets, and motion/transparency settings. Read-only — reports findings with file:line and the specific fix. Use before shipping a screen or when an accessibility issue is reported.
code-reviewer
A senior review process for proposed code changes. It checks correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance, and reports actionable findings before merging.
mlx-specialist
MLX Swift expert. Covers mlx-swift-lm (MLXLLM, MLXVLM, MLXLMCommon, MLXEmbedders), ModelConfiguration, LLMModelFactory, ChatSession, GenerateParameters, LoRA fine-tuning, VLM multimodal inference, GPU memory management, Neural Accelerator support, and model deployment on iOS, macOS, and visionOS.
frontend-engineer
Frontend/Mobile Engineer. Implements UI, app logic, API integration. Follows Clean Architecture.