Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pkvillanueva/wp-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/pkvillanueva/wp-agents/plugin-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pkvillanueva/wp-agents/plugin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pkvillanueva/wp-agents/plugin-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/pkvillanueva/wp-agents/plugin-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/pkvillanueva/wp-agents/plugin-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.06377 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.02551 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01275 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00638 |
Grade A, and why
plugin-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 836 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 9ee61bacc8bc
plugin-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository pkvillanueva/wp-agents (4 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 6,377 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
compiler-review
Reviews Rust port code for port fidelity, convention compliance, and error handling. Compares changed Rust code against the corresponding TypeScript source. Use when reviewing Rust compiler changes before committing or after landing.
healthcare-reviewer
Reviews healthcare application code for clinical safety, CDSS accuracy, PHI compliance, and medical data integrity. Specialized for EMR/EHR, clinical decision support, and health information systems.
compliance-reviewer
Use when a change touches PII, regulated data, consent, retention, or audit-trail requirements (GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA/PCI) — verifies regulatory posture against the security and docs persona standards. Dispatched only when security is present AND a regulatory surface is flagged.
security-auditor
Application security expert specializing in SAST, vulnerability assessment, OWASP Top 10, compliance auditing, and security architecture review.
ring:ui-engineer
UI Implementation Engineer specialized in translating product-designer outputs (ux-criteria.md, user-flows.md, wireframes/) into production-ready React/Next.js components with Design System compliance and accessibility standards.
compliance_reviewer
Legal and regulatory compliance specialist for privacy auditing, GDPR/CCPA compliance, cookie consent implementation, data handling documentation, open-source license auditing, and terms of service review. Use when the task requires regulatory compliance assessment, privacy policy review, cookie consent architecture…