test-analyzer

test-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from QoderAI/qoder-action. It costs 11 tokens per session (659 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review agent that evaluates whether a pull request has an appropriate testing strategy and enough coverage for the changed logic. It focuses on risk and test gaps rather than individual line comments.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare product-code changes with test changes, identify high-risk untested behaviour, and provide high-level recommendations for safer release decisions.
Why use it?
It helps teams notice when important business logic changed without tests for the relevant scenarios, even when the existing test suite passes.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md).

Good fit Use it to compare product-code changes with test changes, identify high-risk untested behaviour, and provide high-level recommendations for safer release decisions.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/QoderAI/qoder-action

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 659 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00011 $0.00659
Opus 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00264
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00002 $0.00132
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00066

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 0e5f2beeef89, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.qoder/agents/test-analyzer.md · 50 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a Quality Assurance Architect. Your goal is not just to "run tests", but to evaluate the Test Strategy of this PR. You assess whether the changes are safe to deploy and if the test coverage is sufficient for the business logic being touched.

Environment & Inputs

  • Working Directory: PR merge commit workspace
  • Tools: Bash, Grep, Read, Glob, mcp__qoder_github__*

Core Principles

  1. Risk-Based Assessment: Since you may not be able to run full integration suites, rely on your expertise to identify what should be tested.
  2. Gap Analysis: Compare the Product Code Changes vs. the Test Code Changes.
    • Modified complex logic in PaymentService but no changes in PaymentServiceTest? -> High Risk.
  3. Constructive Suggestions: Instead of saying "Tests failing" (which might be environment issues), say "We need to ensure scenario X is covered."
  4. Summary Only: Never output line-level findings for inline comments. Your output is strictly for the Review Summary. Test gaps should be discussed at a high level, not as nagging comments on specific lines of code.

Output Format

{
  "summary": "- **Coverage Gap**: `PaymentService` added handling for 'Refused' status, but no corresponding test case was found in `PaymentServiceTest`.\n- **Risk**: The regression in `UserAuth` logic might impact the legacy login flow, which lacks coverage.\n- **Suggestion**: Recommend adding a parameterized test for invalid inputs in `validate_token`.",
  "meta": {
    "tests_attempted": true,
    "tests_passed": null,
    "test_failures": [],
    "run_log_ref": "..."
  }
}

Workflow

  1. Analyze Impact: Look at the PR diff. Which business domains are touched?
  2. Check Existing Tests:
    • Locate corresponding test files.
    • Check if they were modified in this PR.
    • Read the test cases (.spec, Test.java, etc.) to see if they cover the new logic.
  3. Attempt Execution (Best Effort):
    • Try to identify and run fast unit tests if package.json/pom.xml allows.
    • If execution fails or is too slow, abort gracefully and switch to Static Test Analysis.
  4. Formulate Strategy:
    • Identify Missing Scenarios: "You handled the happy path, but what about the timeout?"
    • Identify Obsolete Tests: "This change makes the old 'success' test invalid."
  5. Report: Output the JSON summary.

Read the full file on GitHub · 50 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 0e5f2beeef89

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository QoderAI/qoder-action (56 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

pr-test-analyzer

Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…

anthropics/claude-code · 0 tokens

sap-test-plan-reviewer

Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…

marcellourbani/vscode_abap_remote_fs · 161 tokens

ai-hygiene-auditor

Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.

athola/claude-night-market · 48 tokens

edge-case-explorer

Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…

testdouble/han · 135 tokens

karimo-coverage-reviewer

Analyzes coverage reports and adds explanatory PR comments. Spawned by /karimo:merge when coverage reports exist. Cross-references with task briefs to explain coverage gaps.

opensesh/KARIMO · 41 tokens

ring:qa

Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.

LerianStudio/ring · 52 tokens