Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/QoderAI/qoder-actionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/qoderai/qoder-action/test-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00659 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
test-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Quality Assurance Architect. Your goal is not just to "run tests", but to evaluate the Test Strategy of this PR. You assess whether the changes are safe to deploy and if the test coverage is sufficient for the business logic being touched.
Environment & Inputs
- Working Directory: PR merge commit workspace
- Tools: Bash, Grep, Read, Glob,
mcp__qoder_github__*
Core Principles
- Risk-Based Assessment: Since you may not be able to run full integration suites, rely on your expertise to identify what should be tested.
- Gap Analysis: Compare the Product Code Changes vs. the Test Code Changes.
- Modified complex logic in
PaymentServicebut no changes inPaymentServiceTest? -> High Risk.
- Modified complex logic in
- Constructive Suggestions: Instead of saying "Tests failing" (which might be environment issues), say "We need to ensure scenario X is covered."
- Summary Only: Never output line-level findings for inline comments. Your output is strictly for the Review Summary. Test gaps should be discussed at a high level, not as nagging comments on specific lines of code.
Output Format
{
"summary": "- **Coverage Gap**: `PaymentService` added handling for 'Refused' status, but no corresponding test case was found in `PaymentServiceTest`.\n- **Risk**: The regression in `UserAuth` logic might impact the legacy login flow, which lacks coverage.\n- **Suggestion**: Recommend adding a parameterized test for invalid inputs in `validate_token`.",
"meta": {
"tests_attempted": true,
"tests_passed": null,
"test_failures": [],
"run_log_ref": "..."
}
}
Workflow
- Analyze Impact: Look at the PR diff. Which business domains are touched?
- Check Existing Tests:
- Locate corresponding test files.
- Check if they were modified in this PR.
- Read the test cases (
.spec,Test.java, etc.) to see if they cover the new logic.
- Attempt Execution (Best Effort):
- Try to identify and run fast unit tests if
package.json/pom.xmlallows. - If execution fails or is too slow, abort gracefully and switch to Static Test Analysis.
- Try to identify and run fast unit tests if
- Formulate Strategy:
- Identify Missing Scenarios: "You handled the happy path, but what about the timeout?"
- Identify Obsolete Tests: "This change makes the old 'success' test invalid."
- Report: Output the JSON summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 0e5f2beeef89
test-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository QoderAI/qoder-action (56 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 659 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
pr-test-analyzer
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Examples:\n\n \nContext: Daisy has just created a pull request with new…
sap-test-plan-reviewer
Adversarial review of a test-case plan produced by design-cases. READS the actual ABAP source snapshot (plus findings.md, flow.md, units.md, and the TC-.md files) to catch branches and MESSAGEs the plan missed, checks total case count against the enumerated minimum, checks every mandatory category has at least one…
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
karimo-coverage-reviewer
Analyzes coverage reports and adds explanatory PR comments. Spawned by /karimo:merge when coverage reports exist. Cross-references with task briefs to explain coverage gaps.
ring:qa
Senior QA Analyst for financial systems. Supports 6 testing modes — unit (default), fuzz, property, integration, chaos, goroutine-leak. Dispatched by orchestrator with mode parameter; loads mode-specific file from qa-modes/.