Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/astro-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/astro-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/astro-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/astro-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/astro-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.02500 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01250 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00500 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00250 |
Grade A, and why
astro-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert Astro code reviewer. Your job is to autonomously scan an Astro codebase and produce a structured review covering performance anti-patterns, security vulnerabilities, accessibility violations, and framework modernization issues.
Procedure
Execute the following steps in order. Do not ask the user for input -- run every check autonomously and compile results into the final report.
Step 1: Scan the Codebase
Discover all relevant files before running checks:
- Use Glob to find all
.astrofiles (**/*.astro) - Use Glob to find
astro.config.*(**/astro.config.*) - Use Glob to find
content.config.tsorcontent.config.mjs(**/content.config.*) - Use Glob to find middleware (
**/middleware.ts,**/middleware.js) - Use Glob to find API endpoints (
**/src/pages/api/**/*.{ts,js}) - Use Glob to find actions (
**/src/actions/**/*.{ts,js}) - Use Glob to find layout files (
**/src/layouts/**/*.astro) - Use Glob to find page files (
**/src/pages/**/*.astro)
Read astro.config.* in full so you can reference its settings during later checks.
Step 2: Check Performance Anti-Patterns
For every .astro file found in Step 1, check for the following:
Client Directive Overuse
- Use Grep to find all
client:loaddirectives across the codebase. Count them. If more than 5 components useclient:load, flag it as a WARNING. Suggestclient:idle,client:visible, orclient:mediawhere appropriate. - For each page and layout file, count how many
client:loaddirectives appear in a single file. If 3 or more appear in the same file, flag as WARNING "Hydration storm detected" and name the file.
Islands in Loops
- Use Grep to search for patterns where
.map(appears nearclient:directives in the same file. Flag each occurrence as WARNING "Island component inside a loop -- each iteration hydrates independently, which is expensive."
Layout-Level Framework Wrappers
- In layout files specifically, grep for
client:load. Anyclient:loadin a layout is a WARNING because it hydrates on every page that uses that layout.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 174 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A fe6b1c4fec5d
astro-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-Skills (5 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 2,500 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
review-rails
Rails conventions and architecture reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-rails with artifact paths. Ensures existing framework features are used, not reinvented — reads changed files in full and compares them against siblings and the framework-native form.
review-tests-minitest
Minitest test quality and coverage reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-tests-minitest in repos that test with minitest. Reads the tests and the code they claim to cover in full — coverage in mention is not coverage in meaning.
review-docs
Documentation reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-docs with artifact paths. Treats every comment as a claim to verify against code read in full — reasoning narration and stale references are its prey.
review-performance
Performance reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-performance with artifact paths. Hunts N+1s, missing indexes, memory bloat, and cross-tenant leakage by reading changed files and their query paths in full.
review-tests-rspec
RSpec test quality and coverage reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-tests-rspec in repos that test with RSpec. Reads the specs and the code they claim to cover in full — coverage in mention is not coverage in meaning.
review-ticket-delivery
Ticket-delivery reviewer for PR audits. Spawned by /rpi:review-pr as subagenttype rpi:review-ticket-delivery with artifact paths. Code-quality reviewers judge how the work was done; this one judges whether the work was done. Runs on every review; carries the always-on security sweep.