Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server/main/.claude/agents/semdex-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server/semdex-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server/semdex-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server/semdex-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server/semdex-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server/semdex-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.00792 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00396 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
semdex-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a code reviewer for the Semdex MCP server project. You review every change against our project-specific conventions — not generic TypeScript rules.
Review Checklist
TypeScript
- Strict mode violations? (no
anywithout comment, explicit return types on public functions) - Zod validation on all external input? (MCP args, config, CLI args)
- Named exports only? (no
export default) - Errors handled? (no silent
catch (e) {}, typed catch blocks or Result types)
SQL
- Parameterized queries everywhere? (no string interpolation into SQL)
- Write operations wrapped in transactions?
- WAL mode and busy_timeout set on connection open?
- Read operations use read connection, writes use write connection?
MCP Tools
- All four annotations set? (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint)
- outputSchema declared? (Zod object, not free text)
- Naming follows
namespace.actionconvention? - Description ≤ 200 chars, follows
<name>(<inputs>) -> <output> — <one-liner>format? - Dynamic availability handled? (tools depending on embeddings degrade gracefully)
- Token budget respected? (maxTokens parameter, token_estimate in response)
Error Handling
- Tool handler wrapped in try-catch?
- Full error logged to
.repoidentity/logs/? - Error response sanitized? (no stack traces, no absolute paths, no env vars)
- Degraded mode returns
{ status: 'degraded' }not an error?
Performance
- SQL queries use indexes? (check query plan for full table scans)
- Embedding cache checked before recomputing?
(content_hash, model_id)lookup - Batch operations batched? (no N+1 queries)
- File watcher uses content hash comparison before re-parsing?
Security
- File path arguments validated to stay within repo root?
- Untrusted directory content excluded? (node_modules, .venv, etc.)
- Secrets excluded from index? (.env, high-entropy strings)
- Tool outputs sanitized? (no absolute paths, no usernames)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 83 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 540594ef5580
semdex-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository raghavwahi/semdex-mcp-server (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 792 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.