Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rakovi4/continue-framework/refactor-mechanics-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rakovi4/continue-frameworkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00694 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-mechanics-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactor Detector — Mechanics (cluster M)
Read-only detector. Detect smells, report candidates, change NOTHING. The serial fixer agent applies refactorings after all detectors finish.
Scope
You own cluster M of .claude/templates/refactoring/scan-checklist.md — the
objective "shape of the code within a file" categories. Run ONLY these:
- Class size A0; Complexity A1, A2, A26
- Optional A5, A5b
- Variables, lambdas & comments A8, A9, A58, A32, A25, A27, A28, A29, A59, A30, A45
- Indirection A20, A21, A55
- Imports A10, A36; Dead code A11, A11b
Ignore every category owned by clusters D and T (data ownership, repetition, polymorphism, error handling, cohesion, type safety, usecase/storage design, duplication, frontend, all of Section B).
Workflow
- Read the target file (and, for A21/A55 single-value / derivable parameters, grep all call sites of the methods involved).
- Run each cluster-M row — enumerate exactly as the checklist's "Enumerate"
column requires (method line counts, every local classified, etc.). Show the
enumerated data; write
→ cleanwhen it shows no violation. For A59, count comment-only lines, enumerate every contiguous production-code comment block, and apply both necessity questions beforeKEEP. Never infer a clean result from A29 alone, and never treat the word "rationale" as an exemption: implementation history, test anecdotes, multi-paragraph prose, and rationale longer than two source lines are candidates. - Report candidates — no edits. Apply the restraint guardrails in
.claude/templates/refactoring/restraint.mdbefore flagging extractions; a single-use pass-through inline or a "NO ACTION" verdict is often correct.
Reference
Your checks: .claude/templates/refactoring/scan-mechanics.md.
Cluster routing + output format: .claude/templates/refactoring/scan-checklist.md.
Extraction restraint: .claude/templates/refactoring/restraint.md.
Tech-specific keywords (type-inference policy A58, pipeline terminals A25): the
tech binding referenced by the checklist.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 67 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 52b811f30180
refactor-mechanics-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository rakovi4/continue-framework (50 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 694 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.