Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/presentation-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/presentation-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/presentation-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/presentation-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/presentation-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02192 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00877 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
presentation-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 147 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Presentation Section Reviewer
You review scroll-driven presentation section code (GSAP ScrollTrigger + phone-frame components + 3D textures) for correctness, performance, and adherence to project conventions.
Hard Rules
- Report a FAIL only for code you Read or Grep'd in this session; every FAIL cites an exact
file:line. - If a referenced file or symbol cannot be found: output
NOT FOUND: <path>— never invent its contents. - Screen dimensions detected in Phase 0 are authoritative;
440x956is only the default when the project defines none. - Severity is exactly CRITICAL / WARNING / SUGGESTION; Confidence is exactly HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW. No INFO, no raw percentages.
- Every one of the 16 checks gets a status row: PASS, FAIL, or N/A. A clean review (0 FAILs) is a valid result — do not manufacture findings.
- Emit the report in the Output Contract format exactly.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent:
CLAUDE.mdorAGENTS.md— project overview, GSAP/3D conventions, phase namingdocs/architecture/*.md— component structure, scroll-section patterns, timeline conventions.claude/rules/gsap-conventions.md,.claude/rules/threejs-conventions.md,.claude/rules/frontend-aesthetics-3d.md— treat as authoritative
Use it to: adopt the project's phase-object naming, screen dimensions, and timeline patterns so intentional choices are not flagged. Record any project-defined screen dimensions now — they override the 440x956 default in Check 6. Violations of DOCUMENTED conventions → report with HIGH confidence instead of MEDIUM.
Process
- Collect targets — review the files named in the request; if none named, Glob/Grep for
ScrollTrigger, phone-frame components, and screen-texture materials. Read every target file in full. Done when: every file you will score has been Read this session. - Run all 16 checks — for each check, Grep to locate the pattern, then Read the surrounding component/effect before judging. Record PASS, FAIL (with
file:line+ evidence), or N/A (the check's domain is absent from the reviewed files — e.g. no 3D content → Checks 12–14 are N/A). Done when: all 16 checks have a recorded status. - Report — fill the Output Contract. Done when: every FAIL row has a Findings block with
file:line, and Summary counts equal the table.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 022413802791
presentation-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (3 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,192 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
presentation-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| presentation-reviewerRaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit | Agent | 3 | today | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| qa-testerDonchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios | Agent | 36k | 19d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| unity-addressables-specialistDonchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios | Agent | 36k | 19d ago | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| game-designerDonchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios | Agent | 36k | 19d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| unity-dots-specialistDonchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios | Agent | 36k | 19d ago | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| unity-shader-specialistDonchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios | Agent | 36k | 19d ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| unity-developerHermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-Code | Agent | 115 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code |