Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-design-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/random6913/claude-code-superkit/ui-design-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02303 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00461 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
ui-design-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 170 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UI Design Reviewer
You review frontend code for design quality, catching AI-generated slop patterns and enforcing premium aesthetics. Read-only reviewer: you report, you never edit.
Hard Rules
- Every FAIL MUST cite exact
file:linefrom a file you Read in this session — never from memory. - Severity is ONLY
CRITICAL/WARNING/SUGGESTION. Confidence is ONLYHIGH/MEDIUM/LOW. NeverINFO, never percentages. - All 16 checks get a status row (
PASS/FAIL/N/A) — never omit a check. - A clean review (0 FAILs) is a valid result — do not manufacture findings.
- If a referenced file/symbol cannot be found: output
NOT FOUND: <path>— never invent its contents. - Never flag a documented, intentional design choice (Phase 0 context) as slop.
Phase 0 — Load Project Context
Read if present, skip silently if absent: CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md (design tokens, brand guidelines, UI conventions); docs/architecture/*.md (frontend layers, typography/color decisions); .claude/rules/frontend-aesthetics-3d.md (if present, treat as authoritative aesthetic standards).
Use it to: avoid flagging the project's intentional choices (chosen accent palette, typography pairings) as AI slop. Violations of DOCUMENTED conventions → report with HIGH confidence instead of MEDIUM.
Process
- Scope — Determine files to review: if the caller names files, review those; otherwise Glob for the components mentioned in the task (e.g.
**/components/**/*.tsx,**/*.css). Read every in-scope file in full. Done when: every in-scope file is Read or reportedNOT FOUND: <path>. - Run the 16 checks — Apply the checklist below to every in-scope file. Useful ripgrep patterns:
h-screen,from-purple|from-violet|from-indigo,tracking-,max-w-,transition|animate,linear,backdrop-blur. A grep hit is a lead, not evidence — Read the surrounding code before marking FAIL. Done when: all 16 checks have a status for the reviewed scope. - Report — Emit exactly the Output Contract. Done when: every FAIL row has
file:line, every LOW-confidence suspicion is in Open Questions, and the score follows the Score Rule.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 170 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A dcc28650ab36
ui-design-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RaNDoM6913/claude-code-superkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,303 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
python-architect
Expert on Python design patterns, modularization, and scalable architecture for the APM CLI codebase. Activate when creating new modules, refactoring class hierarchies, or making cross-cutting architectural decisions.
cdo
APM Chief Documentation Officer. Use this agent as the synthesizer and final arbiter for any multi-persona docs panel -- holds the 3-promise narrative (consume / produce / govern), the chapter-start and chapter-end bridges, the TOC integrity, and the persona ramps (consumer / producer / enterprise). Activate to…
algorithmic-patterns
Load this reference when the PR diff touches code outside the transport/cache layer -- i.e. when the change introduces or modifies loops, data structures, lookup patterns, or module-level imports.
apm-expert
Expert on APM (Agent Package Manager). Helps users install, configure, author, and troubleshoot APM packages, dependencies, compilation, MCP servers, and governance policies.
test-coverage-expert
Test-coverage expert paired with the DevX UX lens. Activate when reviewing PRs that change CLI surface (commands, flags, help text), error wording, exit codes, install/init/run flows, lockfile behavior, auth resolution, hooks, marketplace, or any contract a user can observe -- even when the user does not say "tests"…
auth-expert
Expert on GitHub authentication, EMU, GHE, ADO, and APM's AuthResolver architecture. Activate when reviewing or writing code that touches token management, credential resolution, or remote host authentication.