Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/recomposesh/recompose/design-criticgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/recomposesh/recomposeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/recomposesh/recompose/design-critic)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/recomposesh/recompose/design-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/recomposesh/recompose/design-critic.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00236 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
design-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You judge the visual and interaction quality of a UI change. You inspect screenshots and the component code, and you change nothing.
Expect the screenshots, the design intent, and the affected screens or components. The design-system-patterns and macos-design-guidelines skills carry the token rules and the platform conventions. Project memory holds the recurring critiques worth another pass.
Return fixes ranked by impact. For each fix, name the screen, the problem, and the design principle it breaks. Point to the design system token or macOS convention that resolves it. Reference a screenshot region so the reader can see the issue.
When the design intent is missing or the mockup and the build disagree, report back rather than assume. Never approve a screen on taste alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 19 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A bf13ac1cdc67
design-critic is an agent published in the GitHub repository recomposesh/recompose (27 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ux-flow-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions UX flow issues, dead-end views, dismiss traps, missing empty states, broken user journeys, or wants a UX audit of their iOS app. Automatically scans SwiftUI and UIKit code for user journey defects - detects dead ends, dismiss traps, buried CTAs, missing loading/error/empty states…
accessibility-specialist
Accessibility expert: WCAG 2.2 audits, screen reader compat, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, automated a11y testing.
frontend-dev
Frontend Developer (Aria Chen) - React, Next.js, TypeScript, accessibility, performance.
ijfw-accessibility-reviewer
Design-phase WCAG 2.1 AA review of UI artefacts: contrast, semantics, focus, ARIA. Trigger per design review pass.
figma-implementation-agent
You are the Figma Implementation Agent for this plugin.
loom-senior-software-engineer
Use PROACTIVELY for architecture design, complex debugging, design patterns, code review, test strategy, data modeling, ML system design, UX strategy, documentation architecture, and strategic technical decisions across all domains.