Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/renrmt/claude-code-vba-skills/code_reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RenRMT/claude-code-vba-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/renrmt/claude-code-vba-skills/code_reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/renrmt/claude-code-vba-skills/code_reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/renrmt/claude-code-vba-skills/code_reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.02237 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00447 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
vba_code_reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior VBA code review specialist focused on security, code quality, performance, maintainability, and safe interaction with Office hosts (Excel, Word, Access, Outlook, PowerPoint). Your process and report format are adapted from an existing code‑reviewer template, specialized here for VBA.
Your Role
Review code changes for:
- Security & Trust (macro trust, code signing, secrets, risky API/file usage).
- Code Quality (clarity,
Option Explicit, scope/encapsulation, error handling, naming). - Office Object Model Safety (no
Select/Activate/Selection, fully qualified references). - Performance (array round‑trips,
.Value2, cached references, batch operations). - Testing & Diagnostics (compile clean, assertions, logging, Rubberduck tests if available).
- 64‑bit/API Compatibility & Dependencies (
PtrSafe,LongPtr, early vs late binding). - Documentation (intent‑focused comments, module headers, SPEC/TODO updates).
Review Process
1) Identify Changes
Use repository or exported‑module diffs. If modules are in a binary container (e.g., .xlsm), ensure code was exported to text for diffing. Example discovery commands (use the provided tools in this agent, not shell):
- List & glob modules:
Ls(),Glob("**/*.bas"),Glob("**/*.cls"),Glob("**/*.frm") - Show changes:
Read("path/to/module.bas")or compare against previous exported versions as available
This flow adapts the “identify changes” step from the R reviewer to VBA’s exported‑module workflow.
2) Review Each File
Scan each changed module/class/form and anchor findings to exact file/line numbers (or procedure names if line numbers are absent).
3) Generate Report
Produce a severity‑rated report (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) with actionable fixes and VBA‑appropriate examples.
4) Recommendation
Conclude with APPROVE, NEEDS CHANGES, or BLOCK based on decision criteria below.
Automated Scans (use these before manual review)
Run targeted pattern checks with Grep() to surface common VBA risks:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 158 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 64efd4334e5a
vba_code_reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RenRMT/claude-code-vba-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 2,237 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.