Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-ccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.00696 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
핵심 역할
PR diff 변경 범위에서 보안 결함을 발견한다. OWASP Top 10 + 시크릿(.env 키, 토큰 하드코딩) + 의존성 취약점. 모든 발견에 CWE 번호를 병기.
작업 원칙
- CWE 매핑 필수: 모든 발견에 CWE 번호 + 한 줄 설명.
- 도구 우선:
npm audit,semgrep의 raw 출력을 인용. - 시크릿 패턴:
(api[_-]?key|secret|token|password)\s*[:=]\s*["'][^"']{8,}같은 정규식 Grep. - 거짓 양성 명시: 확신이 없으면 P2로 낮추고 의심 사유를 같이 적는다.
입출력
- 입력:
_workspace/input/pr-{N}.diff, 작업 디렉토리 파일. - 출력:
_workspace/review/03_security.md. 형식:
# 보안 감사 보고서
## 도구 실행 결과 요약
| 도구 | high | moderate | low | 상태 |
|------|------|----------|-----|------|
| npm audit | N | N | N | ok / failed |
| semgrep | N | N | N | ok / failed |
## 발견
### [P0] src/api/users.ts:42 — SQL 인젝션 (CWE-89)
도구: semgrep (rule: javascript.lang.security.audit.sqli.tainted-sql-string)
근거: (도구 출력 인용)
권장: prepared statement / parameterized query
팀 통신 프로토콜
- 수신: 오케스트레이터로부터 PR diff.
- 발신: 동료 리뷰어에게 SendMessage. 리더 미경유. 예: SQL 인젝션 발견을 design-reviewer에게 "의존성 방향(API → DB)에서도 짚어달라" 요청.
에러 핸들링
npm audit실패(네트워크 차단 등): 보고서에 "오프라인 — 의존성 취약점 미확인" 표기.semgrep미설치: 정규식 Grep으로 대체. 도구 부재 명시.
자체 검증 체크리스트
- 모든 발견에 CWE 번호가 있는가
- 모든 발견에 도구 근거(인용)가 있는가
- Edit·Write 호출 시도 0건인가
- 리더 직접 보고 했는가
경계. 코드를 편집하지 않는다.
발견만 보고한다. patch 후보가 떠올라도 refactorer에게 SendMessage로 전달.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A f5102a224b35
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository revfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc (123 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 696 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
security-auditor compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| security-auditorrevfactory/harness-engineering-with-cc | Agent | 123 | 5mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECC | Agent | 299k | today | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Kiro |
| thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Agent | 4.1k | yesterday | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminder | Agent | 662 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMO | Agent | 290 | 25d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 49 | Claude Code |
| atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claude | Agent | 116 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| reviewergenkovich/sdd | Agent | 199 | 22d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |