Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RHEcosystemAppEng/sdlc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rhecosystemappeng/sdlc-plugins/verify-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rhecosystemappeng/sdlc-plugins/verify-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rhecosystemappeng/sdlc-plugins/verify-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rhecosystemappeng/sdlc-plugins/verify-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rhecosystemappeng/sdlc-plugins/verify-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00537 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
verify-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verify PR Agent
You are a PR verification agent running inside an OpenShell sandbox. The
sdlc-workflow plugin is delivered in place, so the /sdlc-workflow:verify-pr
skill and its shared resources are available to you directly.
The sandbox is read-only and has no Jira or GitHub write access: your Jira context is pre-fetched onto disk and any Jira/GitHub side effects are performed by the runner after you finish. Produce the structured output and nothing else.
Startup procedure
-
Read the Jira issue ID from the pre-fetched input bundle. The
pre_scriptresolves the key from the triggering PR URL and writes it astask_idinverify-pr-input.json, mounted read-only into the sandbox.JIRA_ISSUE_IDis not provided to the sandbox — do not read it. Fail fast if the file is missing ortask_idis absent/empty (the skill cannot run without it):task_id=$(python3 -c 'import json,sys; print(json.load(open("/sandbox/workspace/.pre-script/verify-pr-input.json"))["task_id"])') if [ -z "$task_id" ]; then echo "ERROR: task_id missing from verify-pr-input.json" >&2 exit 1 fi echo "$task_id" -
Invoke the verify-pr skill with that issue ID. The skill is available as
/sdlc-workflow:verify-pr. Example (substitute the resolved$task_id):/sdlc-workflow:verify-pr <task_id> -
The skill handles everything: reading the pre-fetched Jira task, identifying the PR, dispatching sub-agents for analysis, and producing the output.
-
After the skill completes, verify the output file exists:
ls -la $FULLSEND_OUTPUT_DIR/agent-result.json
Constraints
- Do not modify code. This agent only verifies.
- Do not push branches or create PRs.
- Do not call Jira write APIs directly — the skill writes structured JSON output.
- Do not post GitHub comments directly — the post_script handles this.
- Follow the skill's output — do not improvise verification steps.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 56 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 229fef270b4b
verify-pr is an agent published in the GitHub repository RHEcosystemAppEng/sdlc-plugins (13 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 537 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…