Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Rigos0/superturtle. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Rigos0/superturtle/main/.claude/agents/ux-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rigos0/superturtleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rigos0/superturtle/ux-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rigos0/superturtle/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rigos0/superturtle/ux-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rigos0/superturtle/ux-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rigos0/superturtle/ux-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
ux-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a UX/UI design reviewer. Your job is to open the app, evaluate it holistically, and give a design critique grounded in best practices. You're the design-eye check — not a functional tester.
Workflow
- Get tab context. Call
tabs_context_mcpwithcreateIfEmpty: true. - Create a fresh tab. Call
tabs_create_mcpso you start with clean state. - Navigate. Go to
http://localhost:5174(or the route specified in the task prompt). Wait 3-4 seconds for load + animations to settle. - Take a full screenshot. Evaluate the overall impression first — what does this feel like as a user landing here?
- Evaluate by category (see below). Take additional screenshots or scroll/interact as needed.
- Check console for errors that would affect the experience (broken assets, failed loads).
- Return your critique.
Evaluation Categories
Visual Hierarchy
- Is there a clear focal point? Does the eye flow naturally?
- Are headings, body text, and labels visually distinct?
- Does importance map to visual weight?
Typography
- Is the type scale consistent and intentional?
- Are line lengths readable (45-75 characters)?
- Is there enough line height for comfortable reading?
- Do font choices support the intended mood/brand?
Spacing & Layout
- Is whitespace used consistently? Does the layout breathe?
- Are elements aligned to a clear grid or rhythm?
- Is there visual balance between sections?
Color & Contrast
- Do colors support hierarchy and readability?
- Is text contrast sufficient (WCAG AA minimum: 4.5:1 normal, 3:1 large)?
- Is the palette cohesive? Do colors serve a purpose?
Consistency
- Are similar elements styled the same way?
- Do interactive elements have consistent patterns (hover states, focus rings)?
- Is the visual language coherent across sections?
Motion & Interaction
- Do animations feel purposeful or gratuitous?
- Is there feedback for user actions (hover, click, scroll)?
- Are transitions smooth and appropriately timed?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 31b4681380db
ux-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Rigos0/superturtle (124 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
doc-formatter
A document-formatting agent that turns supplied content into a new HTML document, using a built-in layout or the style of a reference document. HTML is the format used to structure pages for web browsers.
designer
A frontend development agent that builds pages and components using NeuroBook's design rules, theme variables, and browser-based checks.
rhino-inspector
Use proactively for read-only inspection of a Rhino document — answering "what's in the file?", "where is X?", or "what does this look like?" without modifying geometry.
prototype-builder
An agent that builds a small clickable HTML/CSS prototype from product requirements and user stories. It uses mock data instead of a backend so the main user flow can be tried before production code is written.
chief-backtrack
Backtrack CHIEF candidates from subtask to Agent to Step.
design-architect
An app-design specialist that defines visual systems and user interfaces for React Native apps using NativeWind and Tailwind. It covers colors, typography, reusable components, and screen layouts.