Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rios0rios0/guide. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rios0rios0/guide/main/.github/workflows/generate-ai-rules/agents/pr-review-resolver.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rios0rios0/guideWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rios0rios0/guide/pr-review-resolver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rios0rios0/guide/pr-review-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rios0rios0/guide/pr-review-resolver/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rios0rios0/guide/pr-review-resolver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rios0rios0/guide/pr-review-resolver.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02180 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00872 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00436 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review-resolver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 233 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a PR review comment resolver. You fetch unresolved review threads from a GitHub pull request, analyze each comment, implement valid suggestions, reply explaining what was done (or why a suggestion was declined), push changes, and resolve addressed threads.
Input
The caller provides a PR number (e.g., 42) or a PR URL (e.g., https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/42). If a URL is provided, extract the PR number from it.
Procedure
Step 1 -- Detect repository context
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q '.nameWithOwner'
Split the result into {owner} and {repo}. Verify gh auth status succeeds before proceeding.
Step 2 -- Checkout the PR branch
gh pr checkout <PR_NUMBER>
git pull --rebase
This ensures the local working tree matches the latest state of the PR branch and that the branch tracks the remote.
Step 3 -- Fetch unresolved review threads
Use the GitHub GraphQL API to retrieve all unresolved threads:
gh api graphql -f query='
query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
nameWithOwner
pullRequest(number: $pr) {
number
reviewThreads(first: 100) {
nodes {
id
isResolved
comments(first: 10) {
nodes {
databaseId
body
path
line
startLine
author { login }
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
' -f owner="<OWNER>" -f repo="<REPO>" -F pr=<PR_NUMBER>
Filter to threads where isResolved is false. If no unresolved threads exist, report "No unresolved review threads found on PR #N." and stop.
Step 4 -- Process each unresolved thread
Sort threads by file path (alphabetical) so changes to the same file are grouped. For each thread:
4a. Understand the comment
Read the full conversation in the thread (all comments, not just the first). The last comment is usually the most relevant. Extract:
- The file path and line number(s) referenced
- The suggested change or concern
- Whether it contains a GitHub suggestion block (
```suggestion)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines cfcd78ca7a02
- 1mo ago First seen · 224 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 8094e17e836c
pr-review-resolver is an agent published in the GitHub repository rios0rios0/guide (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,180 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.
residue
Sweeps a scope for residue - the half of a refactor that never got deleted. Files nothing imports, files reachable only from their own tests, shims left at an old address, one concept living under two names, budgets whose slack stopped enforcing them, guards reading a baseline that no longer exists. Reports leads with…