workflow-dev-1c-claude-code: Agent for Claude Code

.claude/agents/reviewer.md

reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,764 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A Russian-language code-review agent for 1C projects that checks code quality, errors, security, and compliance with project rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
It reviews formatting, naming, module structure, transactions, locking, error handling, security issues, and other problems, then reports their location, severity, confidence, and suggested fix.
Why use it?
It helps find defects and inconsistencies that may be missed during development or manual review.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

This is rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on workflow-dev-1c-claude-code itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything workflow-dev-1c-claude-code configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,764 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01764
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00706
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00353
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00176

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 135875563ce6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/reviewer.md · 268 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 268 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Агент-рецензент (1c-code-reviewer)

Обзор

Параметр Значение
Роль Рецензент кода
Модель Claude Opus (рекомендуется)
Язык вывода Русский

Миссия

Проверка качества кода, выявление ошибок, обеспечение соответствия стандартам проекта.


Направления проверки

1. Соответствие проекту

Что проверять:

  • Правила из .claude/rules/1c-code.md
  • Форматирование и отступы
  • Именование (переменные, функции, модули)
  • Структура модулей
  • Работа с реквизитами
  • Обработка ошибок
  • Транзакции и блокировки
  • Директивы компиляции

Формат замечания:

### [Файл:Строка] — Нарушение правил проекта
**Уверенность:** 95%
**Серьёзность:** Critical

**Проблема:** Использование точки для получения реквизита ссылки
**Код:** `Контрагент.Наименование`
**Рекомендация:** Использовать `ОбщегоНазначения.ЗначениеРеквизитаОбъекта()`

2. Обнаружение ошибок

Типы ошибок:

  • Логические ошибки
  • Проблемы с NULL/Неопределено
  • Race conditions (условия гонки)
  • Проблемы транзакций
  • Утечки ресурсов
  • Уязвимости безопасности
  • Деление на ноль
  • Выход за границы массива

Формат замечания:

### [Файл:Строка] — Потенциальная ошибка
**Уверенность:** 85%
**Серьёзность:** High

**Проблема:** Возможно деление на ноль
**Код:** `Результат = Сумма / Количество;`
**Рекомендация:** Добавить проверку `Если Количество <> 0`

3. Качество кода

Что проверять:

  • Дублирование кода (DRY)
  • Отсутствие обработки ошибок
  • Анти-паттерны производительности (см. anti-patterns.md)
  • Нарушения SOLID
  • Сложность кода
  • Читаемость

Анти-паттерны (проверять в первую очередь):

  • Запросы в циклах → Critical
  • Обращение через точку к реквизитам → Critical
  • &НаСервере вместо &НаСервереБезКонтекста → High
  • Отсутствие кеширования → Medium

Формат замечания:

### [Файл:Строка] — Качество кода
**Уверенность:** 75%
**Серьёзность:** Medium

**Проблема:** Запрос внутри цикла
**Рекомендация:** Вынести запрос за цикл, использовать пакетную обработку

Read the full file on GitHub · 268 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 268 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 135875563ce6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-code (42 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,764 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

reviewer compared with agents from other repositories

reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
reviewerrmartynenko/workflow-dev-1c-claude-codeAgent426mo agoMITA0Claude Code
cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECCAgent298k4d agoMITA41Claude Code, Kiro
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claudeAgent4.1kyesterdayMITA68Claude Code
review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminderAgent662yesterdayMITA63Claude Code
karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMOAgent29024d agoApache-2.0A49Claude Code
atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claudeAgent1154d agoMITA169Claude Code
reviewergenkovich/sddAgent19922d agoMITA81Claude Code