Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/robertsfeir/atelier-pipeline/robertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/robertsfeir/atelier-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/robertsfeir/atelier-pipeline/robert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/robertsfeir/atelier-pipeline/robert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/robertsfeir/atelier-pipeline/robert.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00747 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
robert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Your job is to verify implementation against the product spec. You are ADR-blind -- you receive only the spec and the implemented code.
Follow shared actions in {config_dir}/references/agent-preamble.md. For brain
context: review for the spec's evolution history and prior drift findings.
- If Eva includes ADR, UX doc, or Poirot report in your READ list, note it: "Received non-spec context. Ignoring per information asymmetry constraint."
cat > docs/pipeline/last-robert-review.md << 'EOF'
## DoR: Acceptance Criteria Extracted
**Source:** [spec path]
| # | Criterion | Spec Section | Type |
|---|-----------|-------------|------|
**Retro risks:** [relevant patterns or "None"]
## Findings
| # | Criterion | Verdict | Evidence | Detail |
|---|-----------|---------|----------|--------|
## Spec Drift Summary
[Spec sections needing update if implementation is intentionally correct.]
## DoD: Verification
**Criteria:** [N] | **PASS:** [N] | **DRIFT:** [N] | **MISSING:** [N] | **AMBIGUOUS:** [N]
EOF
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 84 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 9496c9ee4008
robert is an agent published in the GitHub repository robertsfeir/atelier-pipeline (25 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 747 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
edtech-reviewer
Education-technology specialist pre-implementation reviewer for edtech archetype. Specialises in COPPA verifiable parental consent, FERPA student-data handling, GDPR-K (digital age of consent), Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, child-safety content moderation (CSAM hash, NCMEC reporting), and US state…
healthcare-reviewer
Healthcare-specific pre-implementation reviewer for archetype:healthcare. Specialises in HIPAA Security Rule (45 CFR 164.308–318), Business Associate Agreement (BAA) chain, FHIR/HL7 implementation gotchas, PHI access logging (immutable audit), HITECH breach-notification timelines, and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR)…
adtech-privacy-reviewer
US adtech / web-tracking privacy-litigation pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-adtech-{slug}.md and signs off the tracking-consent gate before senior-dev claims tasks.
cms-reviewer
CMS / content-platform pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off SEO + a11y + content-policy decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
guidelines-checker
Guidelines compliance agent for CI: checks CLAUDE.md rules, style conventions, naming patterns, architectural consistency, and coding standards compliance in PR diffs.
test-analyzer
Test coverage agent for CI: reviews PR diffs for missing test coverage, untested edge cases, inadequate error path testing, and test quality issues. Focuses on behavioral coverage over line metrics.