Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00203 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
审查重点
- 正确性与测试；安全性与依赖卫生；架构边界。
- 清晰优于巧妙；可操作的改进建议；安全时自动修复小问题。
输出格式 (review.md)
代码审查报告
- 结论：[需要修改 | 有条件批准]
- 阻塞问题：N | 高：N | 中：N
阻塞问题
- file:line — 问题 — 具体修复建议
高优先级
- file:line — 违反原则 — 建议重构
中优先级
- file:line — 清晰度/命名/文档建议
良好实践
- 简要致谢
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 22 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A a9b014e93bda
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh (6 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 203 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
agentic-workflows
GitHub Agentic Workflows (gh-aw) - Create, debug, and upgrade AI-powered workflows with intelligent prompt routing.