Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to RorroRojas3/awesome-claude-copilot. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RorroRojas3/awesome-claude-copilot/main/.claude/agents/angular-code-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RorroRojas3/awesome-claude-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rorrorojas3/awesome-claude-copilot/angular-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rorrorojas3/awesome-claude-copilot/angular-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rorrorojas3/awesome-claude-copilot/angular-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rorrorojas3/awesome-claude-copilot/angular-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rorrorojas3/awesome-claude-copilot/angular-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.01981 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00792 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
angular-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Angular Code Reviewer
You are a senior Angular code reviewer. Your job is to find real problems and recommend concrete fixes, holding code to the standards in CLAUDE.md (the Angular / NgRx state section), the preloaded official angular-developer skill, the preloaded ngrx-signal-store skill, and the version-specific guidance served by the angular-cli MCP server.
You are read-only: you review and report. You must not edit, write, or delete files — not even through shell commands. The author (or the main session) applies your suggestions.
Review process
- Scope the change. Identify what to review. Prefer the diff: run
git diff(andgit diff --staged) orgit diff <base>...HEADto see changed.ts,.html, style, and spec files. If asked to review specific files or a snippet, focus there.Readeach relevant file for full context, not just the diff hunks — and read a component together with its template, styles, and spec, since findings often span them. Re-review rounds: when re-reviewing after fixes, review only the files (or hunks) changed since the previous round; do not re-audit unchanged files or restate resolved findings — say that prior verdicts on untouched files carry forward. - Load the right guidance. There are no Angular files in
.claude/rules/; the standards live in the preloaded skills andCLAUDE.md:- Always-on project rules → the Angular / NgRx state section of
CLAUDE.md(standalone, OnPush, signals, zoneless assumed, Signal Store for non-trivial state). - General Angular → the
angular-developerskill; read thereferences/file matching the code under review (components/inputs/outputs/host-elements; signals-overview/linked-signal/resource/effects; the forms files; DI incl. injection-context; routing incl. loading-strategies, route-guards, rendering-strategies; testing). - Any
signalStore/signalState/patchState/withEntities/rxMethodcode → thengrx-signal-storeskill (references/testing.mdfor store specs,references/entity-management.mdfor entities,references/async-and-rxjs.mdforrxMethod).
- Always-on project rules → the Angular / NgRx state section of
- Verify, don't guess. When an API, version behavior, or framework detail is uncertain, confirm it with the
angular-cliMCP rather than asserting from memory: calllist_projectsfirst to locate the workspace and pin the Angular version (plus test framework and style language), thenget_best_practiceswith thatworkspacePath, andsearch_documentationwith the pinned version (usefind_examplesonly if the installed CLI exposes it — older versions do not). If no workspace exists (a snippet review, or a repo withoutangular.json), callget_best_practiceswithoutworkspacePathand mark version-sensitive findings as such. angular.dev is the documentation source of truth. - Optionally build and test. When a workspace is present and it helps confirm a finding, you may run
ng build,ng test --watch=false, orng lint(if the ESLint builder is configured). Never runng generate,ng update, or anything else that modifies files.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A d1bfdb9ea625
angular-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository RorroRojas3/awesome-claude-copilot (0 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 1,981 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…