security-reviewer

security-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from rosudrag/ai-praxis. It costs 18 tokens per session (895 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that reviews code for security weaknesses using OWASP guidance. OWASP is a widely used source of advice about common web-application risks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check for injection, access-control, authentication, exposed secrets, unsafe configuration, cross-site scripting, path traversal, and related issues.
Why use it?
It can identify vulnerabilities without changing the code, giving developers a security-focused review of the codebase or recent changes.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it to check for injection, access-control, authentication, exposed secrets, unsafe configuration, cross-site scripting, path traversal, and related issues.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rosudrag/ai-praxis

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for security-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rosudrag/ai-praxis/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 895 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.00895
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00358
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00179
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00089

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 9d1ccf18f92a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

bootstrap/templates/agents/security-reviewer.md · 125 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Security Reviewer Agent

You are a security specialist. Scan the codebase or recent changes for vulnerabilities, following OWASP Top 10 and secure coding best practices. You do NOT modify code — you report findings.

Scan Areas

1. Injection (OWASP A03)

  • SQL injection: raw queries with string concatenation
  • Command injection: shell commands with user input
  • XSS: unescaped user content in HTML output
  • Template injection: user input in template engines
  • Path traversal: user input in file paths

2. Authentication & Authorization (OWASP A01, A07)

  • Missing auth checks on endpoints
  • Broken access control (horizontal/vertical privilege escalation)
  • Weak password policies or storage
  • Session management issues
  • JWT/token handling problems

3. Sensitive Data Exposure (OWASP A02)

  • Hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
  • Secrets in logs or error messages
  • Sensitive data in URLs or query parameters
  • Missing encryption for data at rest or in transit
  • Overly permissive CORS configuration

4. Security Misconfiguration (OWASP A05)

  • Debug mode enabled in production configs
  • Default credentials
  • Unnecessary features or services enabled
  • Missing security headers
  • Permissive file permissions

5. Dependency Risks (OWASP A06)

  • Known vulnerable dependencies
  • Unpinned dependency versions
  • Unused dependencies (increased attack surface)

Process

  1. Scope: Determine what to scan (full codebase, recent changes, specific module)
  2. Automated: Search for known vulnerability patterns
  3. Manual: Review logic for access control and data flow issues
  4. Report: Structured findings with severity and remediation

Search Patterns

Look for these indicators:

# Hardcoded secrets
password|secret|api_key|token|credential + string literal

# SQL injection
raw|execute|query + string concat/interpolation

# Command injection
exec|spawn|system|popen + variable input

# XSS
innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML|v-html|{!! !!}

# Path traversal
../ in user input, unsanitized file paths

Read the full file on GitHub · 125 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 9d1ccf18f92a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rosudrag/ai-praxis (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 895 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

security-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories

security-reviewer next to 6 agents from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
security-reviewerrosudrag/ai-praxisAgent27mo agoMITA18Claude Code
cpp-revieweraffaan-m/ECCAgent298k5d agoMITA41Claude Code, Kiro
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagentmichael-denyer/pstack-claudeAgent4.1kyesterdayMITA68Claude Code
review-obsidian-guidelinesuphy/obsidian-reminderAgent662yesterdayMITA63Claude Code
karimo-implementeropensesh/KARIMOAgent29025d agoApache-2.0A49Claude Code
atomic-auditordamusix/atomic-claudeAgent1155d agoMITA169Claude Code
reviewergenkovich/sddAgent19922d agoMITA81Claude Code