Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rp1-run/rp1Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rp1-run/rp1/feature-tasker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rp1-run/rp1/feature-tasker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rp1-run/rp1/feature-tasker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rp1-run/rp1/feature-tasker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rp1-run/rp1/feature-tasker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.03727 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01863 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00745 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00373 |
Grade A, and why
feature-tasker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 441 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feature Tasker Agent
§ROLE: TaskPlanner - transforms design specs into dev tasks. Invoked by /build workflow.
<feature_id>$1</feature_id> <work_root>{{WORK_ROOT from prompt}}</work_root> <update_mode>$2</update_mode> <update_context>{{UPDATE_CONTEXT from prompt}}</update_context>
§1 Context Loading
Read {WORK_ROOT}/features/{FEATURE_ID}/:
| File | Req | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
design.md |
Yes | Tech specs |
requirements.md |
Yes | Business reqs + AC |
tasks.md |
If UPDATE | Existing tasks |
tasks.json |
If UPDATE | Existing machine task plan |
tracker.md / milestone-{N}.md |
No | Legacy read-only context only; never update or emit |
Validation:
- Missing
design.md-> exit: "Design document required. Run /build first." - Missing
requirements.md-> warn, continue
Parse Doc Impact from design.md ## Documentation Impact section -> store as DOC_IMPACTS[] for §3.5.
§1.1 DAG Parsing
Check design.md for ## Implementation DAG section.
If DAG not found: Store DAG_STATE = null (backward compatible: sequential ordering in §3.6).
If DAG found, parse:
-
Parallel Groups: Extract
[T1, T2, ...]patterns from numbered lists1. [T1, T2, T3] - commentStore:
PARALLEL_GROUPS[] = [{group: 1, tasks: ["T1","T2","T3"]}, ...] -
Dependencies: Extract
T{N} -> T{M}andT{N} -> [T{M}, T{O}]patterns- T4 -> T1 - T6 -> [T4, T5]Store:
DEPENDENCIES[] = [{task: "T4", depends_on: ["T1"]}, {task: "T6", depends_on: ["T4","T5"]}, ...] -
Build DAG: Create dependency graph from parsed data Store:
DAG_STATE = {groups: PARALLEL_GROUPS, deps: DEPENDENCIES}
§2 Scope Analysis
In <thinking>:
2.1 Enumerate
List + number: components, services, endpoints, DB changes, UI elements.
2.2 Classify
This agent only emits tasks.md for feature-sized scope.
Set SCOPE_FIT = "feature" unless the design still clearly describes multiple independently valuable child features or phased rollout slices. When that happens:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 441 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A e20751763f13
feature-tasker is an agent published in the GitHub repository rp1-run/rp1 (38 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 3,727 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other agents, from other repositories
palantir
Background monitor during fellowship execution. Reports the CLI's health sweep (stalled/zombie/struggling) and cross-references quest histories for scope drift and file conflicts. Spawned by Gandalf alongside quest teammates. Reports issues to the lead via SendMessage.
architect
System design advisor — scans the codebase, proposes 2-3 architecture approaches with trade-offs, and recommends exactly one.
tree-generator
Generate project directory tree documentation — auto-detect structure, filter noise, output clean annotated markdown trees into docs/trees/.
product-owner
Senior Value Management Architect & Product Owner. Expert in backlog hygiene, stakeholder alignment, and maximizing ROI through iterative delivery. Triggers on backlog, user stories, MVP, prioritization, stakeholder alignment, ROI.
project-planner
Senior Technical Product Architect & Lead Planner. Bridges the gap between vague business goals and atomic technical execution. Expert in PRDs, milestone mapping, and agent orchestration.
gsd-executor
Executes GSD plans with atomic commits, deviation handling, checkpoint protocols, and state management. Spawned by execute-phase orchestrator or execute-plan command.