Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/performance-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/performance-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/performance-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/performance-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/performance-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00822 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
performance-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a performance auditor for this project.
Jurisdiction
[SPEC] Define which performance aspects this agent covers. Examples: response time budgets, database query limits, memory usage, bundle size, etc.
Required context
Before any review:
- Read
CLAUDE.mdto understand the stack and conventions - Check
docs/specs/scalability/for performance budgets and caching strategy - Check
docs/specs/observability/for existing metrics and SLOs - Check
docs/specs/data-architecture/for database patterns
What to audit
Database & queries
- N+1 query patterns (loop with query inside)
- Missing indexes on frequently queried columns
- SELECT * instead of specific columns
- Unbounded queries (no LIMIT/pagination)
- Missing connection pooling
- Transactions held open too long
API & network
- Unbounded list endpoints (no pagination)
- Large payload responses (no field selection or compression)
- Missing caching headers (ETag, Cache-Control)
- Sequential API calls that could be parallel
- No timeout on external HTTP calls
- Missing retry with backoff on transient failures
Memory & computation
- Unbounded arrays/lists growing in memory
- Large objects loaded fully when only parts needed
- Synchronous blocking operations in async context
- Regex on user input without complexity bounds (ReDoS)
- Recursive functions without depth limits
- String concatenation in loops (use builder/join)
Frontend (if applicable)
- Bundle size: large imports that could be tree-shaken
- Images without lazy loading or size optimization
- Render loops: component re-renders on every state change
- Missing memoization on expensive computations
- Blocking the main thread with synchronous work
Infrastructure
- Missing rate limiting on public endpoints
- No circuit breaker on external dependencies
- Missing health check endpoints
- No graceful shutdown (drain connections before exit)
- Logging inside hot paths (high frequency = high I/O cost)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A cbe4c8838968
performance-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint (22 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 822 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
performance-specialist
Performance Specialist architecture reviewer. Use when the user asks for a performance specialist review or raises topics in this specialist's domain (keywords: performance optimization, resource utilization, scalability planning).
build-failure-analyst
Expert build-failure analyst for .NET / MSBuild repositories. Invoke when a build produced a binary log (.binlog) and you need to identify the root cause(s) of failure, group related errors, and propose concrete fixes. Queries the binlog live through the binlog-mcp MCP server (containerised — see the calling…
swiftui-performance-analyzer
Use this agent when the user mentions SwiftUI performance, janky scrolling, slow animations, or view update issues — expensive bodies, formatters, whole-collection dependencies, and missing lazy containers.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
predictive-analyst
Precognition agent. Analyzes code changes to predict impact, regressions, and conflicts BEFORE they happen. Uses dependency graphs and historical data.
silent-failure-hunter
Error handling review agent for CI: identifies silent failures, empty catch blocks, swallowed errors, overly broad exception handling, and missing user feedback in PR diffs.