Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rterakedis/leanwheel-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/lw-story-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/lw-story-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/lw-story-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/lw-story-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rterakedis/leanwheel-skills/lw-story-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.00780 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00390 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
lw-story-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 50 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 6cb0bf848252
lw-story-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository rterakedis/leanwheel-skills (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 780 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ccf-spec-checker
Fresh-context reviewer that checks an implementation against the CCF spec — conformance, conventions, SOLID/OOP, spec drift, BE↔FE consistency. Read-only, returns findings with file:line, does NOT fix code. Invoked by /ccf:check, never for coding.
code-reviewer
Review code changes for quality, logic correctness, edge cases, security, and error handling. Return P1/P2/P3 findings using the canonical two-column finding table from references/finding-schema.md (Finding | Suggested Fix, with id/category/location packed into the Finding cell).
verdict-judge
Judge implementation completeness by receiving acceptance criteria and an evidence bundle, then returning per-criterion verdicts of PASS, FAIL, or NEEDS-HUMAN-REVIEW. Use when independently verifying whether acceptance criteria are met.
reviewer
Use this agent as an adversarial pre-merge gate after an executor opens a PR, before merging. Read-only on code. Returns MERGE / ADJUST / REJECT with specifics. Default to skepticism — find the reason NOT to merge. Context: An executor just opened a PR. user: "Review the PR before I merge." assistant: "I'll run the…
api-contract-validator
API contract validation agent that ensures frontend API calls match backend endpoints, request/response types align, error codes are handled, and the API surface is consistent and well-documented.
code-reviewer
Systematic code review agent with two-pass review (CRITICAL then INFORMATIONAL), fix-first heuristic (auto-fix mechanical issues, ask about ambiguous ones), battle-tested pattern detection, suppression list, and evidence-backed findings with file:line citations.