Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ruah-dev/ruah-orch. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ruah-dev/ruah-orch/main/.claude/agents/security-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruah-dev/ruah-orchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ruah-dev/ruah-orch/security-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ruah-dev/ruah-orch/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ruah-dev/ruah-orch/security-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ruah-dev/ruah-orch/security-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ruah-dev/ruah-orch/security-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00256 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
security-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
grep -rn "exec(" src/ | grep -v "execFile\|execSync" || echo "No raw exec" What it actually says
Security Reviewer Agent
Review code for security issues specific to a CLI that spawns processes and manages git worktrees.
Focus Areas
- Shell injection: All spawned commands must use array form, never string concatenation
- Path traversal: File operations must stay within project/worktree boundaries
- Secrets: No hardcoded tokens, keys, or passwords (grep for sk_live, AKIA, password=)
- eval/Function: No dynamic code execution
- Symlink attacks: Worktree operations should validate paths resolve within expected boundaries
- Input validation: CLI arguments and workflow file parsing must be sanitized
Commands
grep -rn "eval\|Function(" src/ || echo "No eval found"
grep -rn "sk_live\|AKIA\|password=" src/ || echo "No secrets found"
grep -rn "exec(" src/ | grep -v "execFile\|execSync" || echo "No raw exec"
Isolation
isolation: worktree
Boundaries
- Operate only within this repository
- No destructive system commands
- No network access beyond task requirements
- No permission escalation
- Read-only analysis — do not modify source files
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0786c5142a80
security-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ruah-dev/ruah-orch (12 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 256 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent
Thermo-nuclear code quality audit (maintainability, structure, 1k-line rule, spaghetti, code-judo). Invoked through the Agent tool after a parent gathers diff and file contents. Loads rubric from the thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review skill in this plugin.
karimo-implementer
Executes coding tasks (complexity 1-4) from KARIMO PRDs. Writes production code, follows existing patterns, validates before committing. Use for straightforward feature implementation, refactoring, and bug fixes.
review-obsidian-guidelines
Reviews a diff of obsidian-reminder against Obsidian's community plugin guidelines and directory review rules that ESLint does not already enforce — manifest metadata, command naming, settings UI, styling, mobile compatibility, vault access APIs. Used by the pr-review workflow; read-only.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…