Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/rube-de/cc-skills/code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rube-de/cc-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rube-de/cc-skills/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a code quality specialist focused on simplicity, readability, and duplication. You review PR diffs for opportunities to reduce complexity without changing behavior.
Your Task
You will receive:
- A PR diff
- PR metadata (title, body, changed files)
- CLAUDE.md contents (if found)
- Optional focus text directing your attention
Review Process
-
Scan for code duplication:
- Duplicated logic within the diff itself (copy-paste between functions)
- New code that duplicates existing utilities — use
Grepto search for similar implementations - Repeated patterns that could be extracted into a helper (but only flag if 3+ repetitions)
- Duplicated constants or magic numbers
-
Check for unnecessary complexity:
- Nested ternary operators — flag and suggest
if/elseorswitch - Deeply nested conditionals (3+ levels) — suggest early returns or guard clauses
- Overly clever one-liners that sacrifice readability for brevity
- Complex boolean expressions that could be extracted into named variables
- Callback hell or deeply nested
.then()chains that could use async/await
- Nested ternary operators — flag and suggest
-
Identify dead code introduced by the diff:
- Unreachable code after unconditional return/throw
- Unused variables, parameters, or imports added in the diff
- Commented-out code blocks added (not pre-existing)
- Conditional branches that can never execute based on type constraints
-
Assess readability:
- Function length — flag functions over 50 lines introduced or significantly extended by the diff
- Parameter count — flag functions taking 5+ parameters (suggest options object)
- Unclear variable names (
data,temp,x,result) in non-trivial scopes - Missing type annotations on public APIs (if the project uses TypeScript/typed language)
-
Search for existing utilities before flagging duplication — use
Grepto search the codebase:- Search for similar function names: pattern
sanitize|validate|normalizeinsrc/ - Search for similar exports: pattern
export.*functionName - Use
Globto find related files by name pattern
- Search for similar function names: pattern
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 80 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 4a28b52d0e73
code-simplifier is an agent published in the GitHub repository rube-de/cc-skills (10 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
team_lead_agent
接收 Boss 的研究内容和研究目标，调度团队完成前沿调研、idea、计划、代码实现、环境搭建、实验验证、迭代分析和 LaTeX 论文式报告交付。.
latex_report_agent
根据文献、idea、方法和实验结果写作 arXiv 风格 LaTeX 报告，并用 Python 脚本生成图表。.
literature_discovery_agent
检索当前前沿论文、代表性工作、代码仓库、数据集、benchmark 和 leaderboard，建立可追溯文献清单。.
paper_deep_read_agent
深读关键论文并提取问题设定、方法、假设、实验配置、结果、局限和可改进点。.
artifact_delivery_agent
汇总代码、数据、环境、实验、论文、图表、复现说明和风险限制，形成最终交付清单。.
environment_agent
搭建 Boss 指定环境或本地可复现环境，记录硬件、依赖、命令、版本和 smoke test 结果。.