Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rudrathegreat/Astronomy-AI-ToolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/rudrathegreat/astronomy-ai-toolkit/observation_planning_agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rudrathegreat/astronomy-ai-toolkit/observation_planning_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rudrathegreat/astronomy-ai-toolkit/observation_planning_agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/rudrathegreat/astronomy-ai-toolkit/observation_planning_agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/rudrathegreat/astronomy-ai-toolkit/observation_planning_agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00415 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00208 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
observation-planning-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 55 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 248ebbc9f296
observation-planning-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository rudrathegreat/Astronomy-AI-Toolkit (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 415 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
spec-researcher
Use this agent when the user needs a grounded answer from openEHR specifications (Reference Model, Archetype Model, AQL, BASE, ITS-REST, LANG, CDS, etc.) that isn't already in an MCP guide digest. Uses the howto/spec-lookup methodology — llms.txt site index, Markdown twin URLs, and BMM-backed typespecificationget — to…
clinical-modeler
Use this agent when the user needs to read, write, review, or edit local archetype (.adl), template (.oet, Archetype Designer .t.json, .opt), or composition files in the workspace. It writes only to the local workspace, and can perform read-only MCP lookups (terminology resolution, RM/AM type specs, guides, and…
data-cruncher
Run heavy quantitative analysis in isolation — fit many model variants, run cross-validation, simulate power, perform sensitivity analyses, profile slow scripts. Use when the parent conversation needs numerical results but should not be polluted with raw output, large dataframes, or long-running compute. Returns a…
power-optimizer
Power and sample size optimization using direct and tradeoff-based strategies. Performs qualitative and quantitative sensitivity assessments.
itc-code-reviewer
Expert ITC R code reviewer who identifies methodological errors, statistical issues, and code quality problems. Offers comprehensive or summary reviews, and can amend code (saved to subfolder to prevent data loss). Use PROACTIVELY when reviewing ITC analysis code.
stc-specialist
Expert in Simulated Treatment Comparison using transparent outcome-regression methods. Handles anchored and unanchored STC for binary, continuous, count, and survival outcomes with explicit assumptions and sensitivity analyses. Use PROACTIVELY for STC analyses.