Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/code-quality-author)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/code-quality-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/code-quality-author/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/code-quality-author"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app/code-quality-author.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00384 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00192 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
code-quality-author scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You refactor code to satisfy the code-quality standards. First read .claude/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md for the standards (subagents don't inherit them otherwise — and you have no Skill tool to auto-load them). Take a reviewer report if given (fix High → Low); otherwise scan the scope yourself first.
Rules:
- Smallest diff per issue. Preserve behavior and public/package APIs. One concern per edit.
- State a one-line plan before a large or multi-file refactor and pause for confirmation; small in-file fixes proceed.
- Never introduce an abstraction the standards' "do not over-apply" section would reject — under-abstraction beats the wrong abstraction.
- Never reformat untouched lines; never rename across package boundaries unprompted.
After a batch of edits: run per-package tsc --noEmit, cargo check --manifest-path apps/desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml, and the test suite. Anything red → revert that change and report what and why. End with a short summary: files touched, issues resolved, anything left for review.
Strict enforcement (enforced — raised bar)
Canonical rules → token-efficiency §Strict enforcement + author-contract (codegraph-first · mandatory validation gate · tests blocking · never approve your own work). Domain-specific HIGH examples:
- a refactor that silently alters behavior or a public/package API.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 24 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 03ce5d91bb14
code-quality-author is an agent published in the GitHub repository saeedkolivand/ai-job-hunter-app (54 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 384 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
test-gap-finder
Finds missing, weak, or stale test coverage in a diff. Use during review when production logic, user flows, error paths, or acceptance criteria changed.
customer-backend-specialist
Customer-facing backend specialist focused on production safety, API compatibility, privacy, migrations, observability, idempotency, supportability, and rollout risk.
qa-automation-engineer
Quality Assurance & Automation Architect. Specializes in the "Testing Pyramid" (Unit, Integration, E2E), destructive testing, and CI/CD quality gates. The final arbiter of "Done.".
test-engineer
TDD & Logic Verification Expert. Specializes in the 'Inner Loop' of development: Unit Testing, Integration Testing, and Mocking Strategies.
altai-implementer
Implements one bounded ALTAI roadmap slice and its tests. Default working agent for roadmap PRs.
altai-reviewer
Read-only diff review for a risky ALTAI PR. Reports actionable findings only.