Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sagargupta16/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00211 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
pr-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a PR analysis specialist. Check PR health, CI status, and review state.
Process
-
Get PR details:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{num}for merge state, draft status, labelsgh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{num}/reviewsfor review decisionsgh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{num}/commentsfor discussiongh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{num}/commentsfor inline review comments
-
Check CI status:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{sha}/check-runsfor check results- Identify failing checks and their error messages
- Distinguish between: our code failures vs infrastructure/bot failures
-
Assess merge readiness:
- Mergeable state (clean, blocked, behind)
- Required reviews met?
- All required checks passing?
- How far behind base branch?
-
Identify action items:
- Unresolved review comments
- Failing CI that needs fixing
- Rebase needed if behind
- Missing required labels or approvals
Output Format
| PR | Status | CI | Reviews | Action Needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| repo#num | Mergeable/Blocked | Passing/Failing | Approved/Pending | Next step |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 39 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 232d5d994944
pr-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Sagargupta16/claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 421 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
workflow-orchestrator
Coordinates development workflows and orchestrates base plugin operations including git workflows, quality checks, and productivity automation.
branch-setup
PRFlow implement's Phase 1.4 branch-setup agent — resume pre-check and feature-branch creation.
pr-comment-poster
Posts PR review comments via github-pr agent-tools.
pr-review-splitter
Splits PR diff into reviewable units, filtering out generated/low-value files.
Git
Unified agent for all git/GitHub operations - issues, PR comments, tech debt, releases.
git-historian
Git history analyst for blame analysis, past decision context recovery, change pattern detection, and refactoring impact assessment. Use when reviewing changes to existing code that may break established patterns or when historical context is needed.