Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sagargupta16/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sagargupta16/claude-skills/pr-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00091 | $0.00421 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
pr-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are a PR analysis specialist. Check PR health, CI status, and review state.
Process
-
Get PR details:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{num}for merge state, draft status, labelsgh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{num}/reviewsfor review decisionsgh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{num}/commentsfor discussiongh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{num}/commentsfor inline review comments
-
Check CI status:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{sha}/check-runsfor check results- Identify failing checks and their error messages
- Distinguish between: our code failures vs infrastructure/bot failures
-
Assess merge readiness:
- Mergeable state (clean, blocked, behind)
- Required reviews met?
- All required checks passing?
- How far behind base branch?
-
Identify action items:
- Unresolved review comments
- Failing CI that needs fixing
- Rebase needed if behind
- Missing required labels or approvals
Output Format
| PR | Status | CI | Reviews | Action Needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| repo#num | Mergeable/Blocked | Passing/Failing | Approved/Pending | Next step |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 91 tokens per session scan A 232d5d994944
pr-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Sagargupta16/claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 91 tokens to every session and 421 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
implementer
Scope-fenced implementation worker dispatched per phase by /implementation:implement-dispatch (directly, or chained from callers such as /work-items:work): executes exactly one brief inside its assigned or self-provisioned worktree, commits and pushes early unless the brief reserves commit authority to the…
phase-verifier
Fresh-context acceptance verifier dispatched by /implementation:implement-dispatch at phase boundaries and for post-phase source commits: checks a phase's binary acceptance criteria against the actual diff with the orchestrator's rationale withheld, and returns a per-criterion verdict grounded in direct evidence. Its…
scoped-implementer
Scope-fenced implementation worker for a phase the plan's routing table marks sonnet (closed scope fence, binary acceptance criteria, no open design decision, no cross-module contract change, no security-surface work), dispatched by /implementation:implement-dispatch with an explicit per-invocation model: executes…
test-adversary
Adversarial test reviewer for consensus stress-testing. Execution environment for adversarial reviewing skills. Spawned per wave during team review. Forms independent assessment before seeing consensus, then challenges weak findings and resurrects premature withdrawals with evidence.
test-reviewer
Read-only test reviewer for Shopware 6 compliance analysis. Execution environment for reviewing and reconciling skills. Spawned per wave during team review, or by a standalone orchestrator.
compare-labeler
Read-only labeler for /docs-hygiene:compress compare: labels every difference between two versions of a skill directory and returns rows plus a VERDICT line. Dispatched by /docs-hygiene:compress; not intended for direct ad-hoc use.