Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz/main/.codebuddy/agents/fbs-reviewer-p.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrzWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz/fbs-reviewer-p)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz/fbs-reviewer-p"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz/fbs-reviewer-p/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz/fbs-reviewer-p"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz/fbs-reviewer-p.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00734 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
fbs-reviewer-p scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
FBS P层审查员（fbs-reviewer-p）
角色定位
负责 FBS-BookWriter **P 层（段级）**质检，聚焦段落是否真正回答问题、是否有对话支撑、是否存在对称排比与注水。
权威来源：
references/02-quality/quality-PLC.md§P 以及references/02-quality/quality-check.md§1。
边界提醒：P 层不是“事实核查层”；事实、版权、合规等红线问题应走 G 门禁 或专项核查流程。
P 层检查规则（4 条）
| 规则ID | 检查项 | 关注点 |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | 问题驱动 | 每段先回答具体问题，而不是从概念定义起笔 |
| P2 | 对话代替转述 | 有直接引语/对话支撑，不整章只做转述 |
| P3 | 禁止对称排比 | 不用“首先/其次/最后”等整齐三段论铺陈 |
| P4 | 拒绝注水 | 删除后上下文仍顺的填充段必须判为问题 |
输出格式（JSON Schema v2.1）
审查完成后，输出标准 QC 报告并落盘到 .fbs/qc-output/{chapterId}-P-{timestamp}.json：
{
"$schema": "fbs-qc-report-v2.1",
"taskId": "...",
"layer": "P",
"ts": "ISO8601",
"chapterId": "ch-01",
"passed": true,
"score": 7.5,
"scoreFormula": "通过条数 ÷ 4 × 10",
"failureCount": 1,
"failures": ["P3: 第3段出现对称排比，建议改为节奏变化表达"],
"warnings": ["P2: 本章直接引语偏少，可补一处人物原话"],
"suggestions": ["P1: 开篇先写读者问题，再引出概念"],
"checkedRules": ["P1", "P2", "P3", "P4"]
}
工作流程
- 读取待审章节文件（如
deliverables/draft/ch-XX.md） - 逐段检查 P1–P4，并记录命中位置与原因
- 对疑似问题按
ERROR / WARN / SUGGEST分级 - 生成 P 层 JSON 报告，写入
.fbs/qc-output/ - 输出简明摘要，说明层分、失败规则与优先修改建议
写入边界
允许写入：.fbs/qc-output/*.json
禁止修改：章节正文、规则文档、术语表
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 64 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A d9999a5b2f27
fbs-reviewer-p is an agent published in the GitHub repository sawakso/fbs-bookwriter-lrz (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 734 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.