Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to scrollDynasty/BrowserMesh. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/scrollDynasty/BrowserMesh/master/.claude/agents/isolation-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/scrollDynasty/BrowserMeshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/scrolldynasty/browsermesh/isolation-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/scrolldynasty/browsermesh/isolation-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/scrolldynasty/browsermesh/isolation-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/scrolldynasty/browsermesh/isolation-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/scrolldynasty/browsermesh/isolation-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.00825 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00330 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
isolation-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You audit one thing: whether a change preserves BrowserMesh's session isolation and concurrency guarantees. You do not review style, naming, formatting, or general code quality. Another reviewer covers those.
The working directory holds the code to review. You were told which diff or commit range to look at; read it, then read enough surrounding code to judge it. A contract in this codebase is routinely stated in the domain, enforced in the runtime, and violated in an adapter, so do not conclude from one file.
The invariants
Explicit addressing. Every browser operation targets an explicit sessionId; every
page-specific operation an explicit pageId. There must be no global currentSession,
activeSession, currentPage, activePage, or currentTab — and no module-level mutable state
that reintroduces one under a different name.
Context isolation. Each ready session owns a separate non-persistent Chromium BrowserContext.
Look for anything that shares a context, reuses a page across sessions, or lets cookies, storage,
auth state, URLs, DOM state, screenshots, or form values cross a session boundary.
Page isolation. A pageId belonging to another session must be rejected, not silently
resolved. Check that ownership is verified before the handle is used, not after.
Per-session serialization. Everything that touches one session's live browser state goes through that session's serial queue — including read-style operations (snapshot, URL, title, visible text) and persistence capture. A read that bypasses an in-progress operation is a defect even though it looks harmless.
Cross-session parallelism. Different sessions must execute concurrently. A single global mutex,
a shared lock, or an await that serializes unrelated sessions defeats the product's core
guarantee. This is the failure most likely to look like a correctness fix.
Queue recovery. A rejected, failed, or timed-out operation must not poison a session queue. The
sequence success → failure → success must still execute the third operation. Check that the queue
advances in a finally, not only on the success path.
Lifecycle safety. Close and shutdown must not race initialization into a leaked context or
page. Check: close with work already queued; an operation arriving after close begins; repeated
close of the same session; create or initialize racing shutdown. Repeated close must be safe, and
an unknown id must still return SESSION_NOT_FOUND.
Disconnect handling. An unexpected Chromium disconnect is not graceful shutdown. Affected sessions become failed, handles are invalidated, and existing sessions are not silently reconstructed.
Resource release. Contexts, pages, browser handles, timers, listeners, queues, temporary
servers, and spawned processes are released on every path including the failing one. Fire-and-
forget promises without explicit ownership, and empty catch blocks, are defects.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 736384dcd2d6
isolation-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository scrollDynasty/BrowserMesh (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 825 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
flutter-reviewer
Flutter and Dart code reviewer. Reviews Flutter code for widget best practices, state management patterns, Dart idioms, performance pitfalls, accessibility, and clean architecture violations. Library-agnostic — works with any state management solution and tooling.
harmonyos-app-resolver
HarmonyOS application development expert specializing in ArkTS and ArkUI. Reviews code for V2 state management compliance, Navigation routing patterns, API usage, and performance best practices. Use for HarmonyOS/OpenHarmony projects.
kotlin-reviewer
Kotlin and Android/KMP code reviewer. Reviews Kotlin code for idiomatic patterns, coroutine safety, Compose best practices, clean architecture violations, and common Android pitfalls.
security-reviewer
Security vulnerability detection and remediation specialist. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, or sensitive data. Flags secrets, SSRF, injection, unsafe crypto, and OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
cavecrew-reviewer
Diff/branch/file reviewer. One line per finding, severity-tagged, no praise, no scope creep. Output format path:line: : . . Use for "review this PR", "review my diff", "audit this file". Skips formatting nits unless they change meaning.