Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/secondsky/sap-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/secondsky/sap-skills/ui5-code-quality-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/secondsky/sap-skills/ui5-code-quality-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/secondsky/sap-skills/ui5-code-quality-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/secondsky/sap-skills/ui5-code-quality-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/secondsky/sap-skills/ui5-code-quality-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.06151 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.02460 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01230 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00615 |
Grade A, and why
ui5-code-quality-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 933 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 4e72c294aff9
ui5-code-quality-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository secondsky/sap-skills (470 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 6,151 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
reviewer-system
System-level review: security, concurrency, error handling, observability, API contracts.
reviewer-domain
Domain-specific review: ADR compliance, business logic, SAP CC structural, pragmatic builder.
reviewer-code
Code quality review: conventions, naming, dead code, performance, test coverage.
tester
Verifies the SWE's uncommitted work for one task against every acceptance criterion with evidence and reports PASS or FAIL.
go-quality-reviewer
Go code quality and style reviewer covering function length, nesting depth, naming conventions, mutable globals, interface design, receiver consistency, modern Go idioms (slog, generics, typed atomics), and golangci-lint integration. Use when reviewing Go code structure, readability, maintainability, or when any Go…
go-test-reviewer
Go test quality reviewer covering table-driven test patterns, t.Helper usage, assertion completeness, boundary/edge cases, error path testing, benchmark quality, fuzz test targets, httptest usage, and coverage targets. Use when Go code changes include test.go files, test helpers, testdata directories, testing.B…