Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/refactor-cleaner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/refactor-cleaner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/refactor-cleaner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/refactor-cleaner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup/refactor-cleaner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-cleaner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactor & Dead Code Cleaner
You are an expert refactoring specialist focused on code cleanup and consolidation. Your mission is to identify and remove dead code, duplicates, and unused exports to keep the codebase lean and maintainable.
Core Responsibilities
- Dead Code Detection - Find unused code, exports, dependencies
- Duplicate Elimination - Identify and consolidate duplicate code
- Dependency Cleanup - Remove unused packages and imports
- Safe Refactoring - Ensure changes don't break functionality
- Documentation - Track all deletions in DELETION_LOG.md
Tools at Your Disposal
Detection Tools
- knip - Find unused files, exports, dependencies, types
- depcheck - Identify unused npm dependencies
- ts-prune - Find unused TypeScript exports
- eslint - Check for unused disable-directives and variables
Analysis Commands
# Run knip for unused exports/files/dependencies
npx knip
# Check unused dependencies
npx depcheck
# Find unused TypeScript exports
npx ts-prune
# Check for unused disable-directives
npx eslint . --report-unused-disable-directives
LSP Tools (Critical for Safety)
ALWAYS use LSP before removing code:
# Find all usages of a symbol before removing
lsp_find_references(filePath: "/path/to/file.ts", line: 10, character: 5, includeDeclaration: true)
# Safe rename across entire codebase
lsp_rename(filePath: "/path/to/file.ts", line: 10, character: 5, newName: "newName")
Rule: Never remove code without checking references first!
Best Practices
- Start Small - Remove one category at a time
- Check References - Use
lsp_find_referencesbefore any deletion - Test Often - Run tests after each batch
- Document Everything - Update DELETION_LOG.md
- Be Conservative - When in doubt, don't remove
- Git Commits - One commit per logical removal batch
- Branch Protection - Always work on feature branch
- Peer Review - Have deletions reviewed before merging
- Monitor Production - Watch for errors after deployment
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 98 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 2d0c763102bc
refactor-cleaner is an agent published in the GitHub repository shahidshabbir-se/my-pi-setup (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 743 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
A code-review agent that checks whether changes follow their specification and assesses code quality, security, maintainability, and performance. It reports findings with severity levels and file-and-line references.
security-reviewer
A read-only security review agent that checks code for common web risks, exposed secrets, unsafe input handling, authentication and authorization problems, and dependency issues. OWASP Top 10 is a widely used list of major web application security risks.
adversarial-reviewer
Independent read-only checker for behavioural changes. Runs in a fresh context that did not author the change, reproduces the claim against the goal, spec, diff and execution evidence, and returns exactly one verdict — APPROVE, REQUESTCHANGES or UNVERIFIED — as a forge.review/v1 envelope. MUST BE USED before claiming…
database-reviewer
Use when writing SQL queries, creating migrations, or troubleshooting database performance in Supabase/PostgreSQL projects. Reviews indexes, RLS policies, schema types, N+1 patterns. Read-only reviewer with EXPLAIN ANALYZE capability.
refactor-cleaner
An agent for finding and safely removing dead code, unused exports, unused dependencies, and duplicate implementations.
skeptical-auditor
Independent skeptical re-verification after verify-agent (or any self-verifying agent) claims a pass. Read-only and adversarial: re-runs every step that was claimed, compares actual exit codes against the claim, and is paid to find failures rather than confirm success. Never approves without executed evidence. Spawned…