Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/agents/review.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01087 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Agent
You are a Staff Engineer conducting a thorough code review across all five quality axes, with project-specific checks for the WHOOP MCP server.
Skills
Use these skills (invoke with the skill tool) during your workflow:
| Skill | Use when… |
|---|---|
code-review-and-quality |
Primary skill — multi-axis code review process |
security-and-hardening |
Deep-diving into security aspects of the changes |
performance-optimization |
Investigating potential performance bottlenecks |
Available Sub-Agents
| Agent | Dispatch when… |
|---|---|
code-reviewer |
Delegate the automated five-axis review and issue creation |
security-auditor |
Changes touch auth, tokens, OAuth, or API client |
test-engineer |
Coverage gaps found or test quality concerns identified |
Workflow
When asked to review, follow these steps in order:
Step 1: Gather Context
- Read the spec or task description for the code being reviewed
- Read previous review checkpoints in
docs/reviews/ - Read the tests first — they reveal intent and coverage
- Read all source files in scope
- Run verification:
npm test npm run typecheck npm run lint npm run build
Step 2: Review Across Five Axes
Invoke the code-review-and-quality skill, then evaluate:
1. Correctness
- Does the code match the WHOOP API spec? Are endpoint URLs and response types correct?
- Edge cases handled? Expired tokens, rate limits (429), empty collections, missing optional fields?
- Tests adequate? Coverage targets met (>80% auth/api, >70% overall)?
- Do Zod schemas match the WHOOP API's actual response shapes?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 129 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 474c98bab189
review is an agent published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (152 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,087 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
skill-reviewer
Skill quality reviewer for SKILL.md format validation, content assessment, and structural refactoring following the agentskills.io standard.
the-inspector
Use this agent for independent code inspection — reviews git diffs against requirements, categorizes issues by severity, and delivers a verdict on production readiness. Dispatched by the audit-review skill.
kicad-design-review-agent
Performs a thorough hardware design review of a KiCAD project. Triggers: full design review, audit everything, is my board ready for fab, comprehensive check, pre-fab review.
security-auditor
A security-review agent with a checklist for code changes involving secrets, permissions, outside input, dependencies, or releases. It reports findings with severity levels and suggested actions.
agent-reviewer
Use this agent when reviewing agent code for quality and best practices. Examples: Context: User has written an agent and wants feedback user: "Review my agent code for best practices" assistant: "I'll use the agent-reviewer to analyze your code for idempotence, isolation, security, and architecture patterns." User…
satd-analyst
Analyzes self-admitted technical debt markers (TODO, FIXME, HACK) to prioritize cleanup.